New research finds widespread concerns over lack of Brexit readiness at law firms
40% of lawyers at large firms expect their employer to move jobs out of the UK over next decade
October 19, 2018 at 05:46 AM
3 minute read
Almost half of lawyers say they are unprepared to deal with the impact of Brexit, according to new research that also sheds light on the extent to which large law firms are expecting to move jobs outside of the UK as a result of its split from the EU.
The Thomson Reuters report, Helping to understand the impact of Brexit, draws on a survey of more than 250 legal service professionals, including interviews with lawyers at firms including Allen & Overy, Baker McKenzie, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Pinsent Masons and HFW.
Almost half of all respondents (47%) said they were 'not well prepared' to tackle threats posed by Brexit during the next two years, while nearly two thirds (63%) agreed that Brexit represented more of a threat than an opportunity in the short term.
The research also found that 40% of lawyers at large firms are expecting their employer to relocate jobs outside of the UK during the next decade.
More than one in five (21%) of respondents said they expect more than 10% of their firm's total UK employment to be moved to non-UK offices in the coming years, including 9% who said this figure could be higher than 20%.
The analysis compares the 5% growth of the legal sector in the 18 months following the 2016 Brexit referendum against 3% for the wider UK economy, but argues that, as the fallout from Brexit starts to take effect, this will reverse. Sectors including financial services, competition and intellectual property are marked out as areas likely to experience 'high long-term disruption'.
Despite the research findings, many lawyers remain sanguine, with one partner at a large City firm commenting: "We've been preparing for Brexit for a long time. We have held internal meetings across our different practice areas and with our sector leads. And I think we are as well prepared as you would expect. We don't see any headcount reduction as being in sight or even a problem."
Another City partner believes the process could produce as many opportunities as it does challenges: "For some sectors, it will lead to more rather than less work. In a no-deal scenario, disputes work will likely increase, as will competition work as a result of the repatriation of regulations. And the Competition and Markets Authority will be busier, so it opens up a new market."
Firms started to take precautionary measures against Brexit ahead of the referendum in June 2016, amid fears that they may find it more difficult to practise EU law without lawyers registered in an EU country. This included registering lawyers in Ireland.
This summer, a Legal Week survey found that 75% of City partners favoured a second Brexit referendum.
Photo credit: Banksy
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpanish Firm Continues Geographical Diversification With Latest Partner Appointments
MoFo Replenishes Singapore Corporate Partner Loss as Lawyer Returns From Gibson Dunn
Trending Stories
- 1SDNY US Attorney Damian Williams Lands at Paul Weiss
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Norton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over Ethnicity Score System
- 5KMPG Wants to Provide Legal Services in the US. Now All Eyes Are on Their Big Four Peers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250