International growth at top firms outstrips UK perfomance for first time, PwC finds
New PwC research also shows mergers remain high on the agenda for top firms
October 22, 2018 at 05:44 AM
3 minute read
The international offices of the top 10 global law firms contributed more to revenue and profit growth than their UK operations for the first time last year, according to PwC's latest annual law firm survey.
PwC's research, which is based on a survey of the UK's 100 largest law firms, found that during 2017-18, the top 10′s international offices accounted for an average of 83% of total global fee income growth, compared to 50% in 2017.
Offices in western Europe provided 57% of this growth, while Chinese offices accounted for 12%.
PwC partner David Snell, who leads the advisory group, said: "The bigger firms have for a long time been investing in their international reach, and they have a more established geographical footprint, and they're now starting to reap the return on those investments, both in Europe, but also in China.
"The larger firms have been investing in their Chinese practices for a while and now have significant presences in Hong Kong, as well as in Beijing and Shanghai. But in the mid-tier, international work is less developed and so they tend to have a less developed footprint."
Among firms in the 11-25 bracket, growth was more evenly spread, with UK offices responsible for 55% and international offices 45%.
Among the UK's top firms, mergers continue to figure high on the list of priorities, with 40% of the top 10 and 27% in the 11-25 bracket saying they would consider a combination to help deliver profit growth.
According to the report, what type of merger each firm seeks depends chiefly on firm size, with the top 10 by and large more interested in an international merger – with the US marked as a key target market – whereas mid-tier firms "are focused on smaller UK mergers".
"We've said for some time consolidation in the sector is likely because there are a lot of law firms and limited demand for provision of services," says Snell. "And we will continue to see this, both UK to UK and UK to international."
The research also shows that, among the respondents, technology and Brexit are the most significant challenges facing the legal profession from now until 2020, with all top 10 respondents regarding technology as the bigger challenge of the two.
"So far the market has held up pretty well, and we've seen a good year," says Snell. "But is there less optimism about 2019? Yes. And rightly so. But if you think about it, looking at top 10 growth, it's broadly international, and so they're agile enough to adapt. So future-proofing and tech investment have been the bigger concerns. But for smaller firms, it's about Brexit because they're less diversified."
The report also found more evidence of law firms moving away from the traditional lockstep model towards more performance-oriented models, as firms look to "incentivise the right behaviours".
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMoFo Launches in Amsterdam: Exclusive Interview with Global Chair Eric McCrath
2 minute readClifford Chance Boosts Private Credit Offering With Mayer Brown Partner Duo
2 minute readEx-Mayer Brown Corporate Lawyer Leads Race for German Chancellor in Snap Election
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts, Lawyers Press On With Business as SoCal Wildfires Rage
- 2Florida, a Political Epicenter, Is the Site of Brownstein Hyatt's 13th Office
- 3Law Firms Close Southern California Offices Amid Devastating Wildfires
- 4Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
- 5Holland & Knight Picks Up 8 Private Wealth Lawyers in Los Angeles
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250