'This will define them' – as O'Melveny merger nears, how are A&O's top brass rated?
At the midway point of their tenure, with a transformative US merger in sight, how are A&O leadership duo Wim Dejonghe and Andrew Ballheimer perceived by their peers?
October 30, 2018 at 07:19 AM
7 minute read
More than halfway through their terms as Allen & Overy (A&O) senior and managing partner, Wim Dejonghe and Andrew Ballheimer face a pivotal moment in the magic circle firm's history.
The pair are currently overseeing merger talks with US firm O'Melveny & Myers, with many expecting a vote on the deal before the end of the year. The outcome will define not only A&O's future, but also the legacies of the leadership duo. At this key juncture, how does the market rate Dejonghe and Ballheimer's time at A&O's helm so far?
Since taking charge of the firm in 2016, they have overseen two years of impressive financial results, with the firm's record-breaking performance for 2016-17 propelling profit per equity partner (PEP) up by 26% to break £1.5m and revenue rising 16% to £1.52bn.
And while 2017-18 was a year of less dramatic growth, revenue and PEP still rose 4% to £1.57bn and £1.64m respectively.
An A&O City partner says the pair have done "astonishingly well" financially, adding that the firm's 2018-19 results so far are "amazing" and will be "way ahead of last year".
That partner states: "Wim is the one who's made us financially successful. He's very target-driven."
A former European partner describes being "stunned" by the financial performance at the firm in recent years, adding: "Wim and Andrew are both very financials-focused."
While all current and former A&O partners Legal Week spoke to for this article extolled the firm's financial performance during the past two years, praise of the approach deployed to achieve these headline-grabbing figures is less unanimous.
You need to pay a price if you want a US merger
What is characterised as an incessant focus on financial metrics has caused some "grumbling" within the firm, according to one former London partner. He explains: "At A&O there's a metric for everything, and that's been a frustration for a lot of partners. You get bored of operating to move numbers rather than going out and finding clients."
However, another current London partner tempers this: "Wim is obsessed with numbers – him and Andrew both are – but I don't feel any pressure from it."
Other methods of boosting profitability have included a rethink of partner remuneration. Last year, the firm undertook a review of its German partnership's equity, with 50% of partners seeing their points either held or cut in a bid to improve profitability.
According to several former partners, this approach has also been adopted in the firm's Paris office. One former partner tells Legal Week: "Paris has already been affected, and there is more to come."
The ex-partner says that has put the partnership in "defensive mode", adding: "There are a number of partners watching their backs due to that equity management."
This approach has left some concerned over the effect on culture. As one former German partner puts it: "You can only think about a US merger if you pimp up the firm before. Their best-ever year brought them into the same ballpark as O'Melveny – but this was achieved through equity management. You need to pay a price if you want a US merger."
Another former London partner adds: "They have been more aggressive in terms of cutting equity. How high a price are you prepared to pay culturally for it?"
They were worried that very talented partners weren't being incentivised
At the time of Dejonghe and Ballheimer's election, A&O partners expected them to run the rule over the firm's governance structure – and following a partnership consultation, a new executive committee was introduced last year, which is chaired by the pair.
One former partner says: "When they started, they were worried that very talented senior client partners weren't being incentivised within the firm. They wanted to get some of those people onto the exec committee."
In 2016, some partners were also unhappy with A&O's appraisal system, which they felt did not adequately recognise their individual contributions. They argued that the system placed too much emphasis on contribution to a specific office rather than a global practice.
Several years ago, the firm introduced a discretionary bonus pool to reward star performers and new recruits, which is understood to have been used for the first time when it hired a high-profile New York finance team two years ago. However, according to one ex-City partner, last year the firm drew on the pool to reward London partners for the first time, adding: "There was a lot of inward pressure to use it for existing partners during the last financial year."
Earlier this year, the firm also announced plans to move all of its staff to a new performance management scheme, becoming the latest firm to scrap annual appraisals in favour of a system based on ongoing feedback.
They promised to think about how technology is invading everything, and to throw our balance sheet behind it
Dejonghe and Ballheimer also attract praise for fostering a sense of innovation at the firm, and last year A&O launched its tech startup initiative Fuse, which now houses companies including Kira Systems and Neota Logic, while former resident Bloomsbury AI was acquired by Facebook earlier this year.
One London partner says: "They promised to think carefully about the future and how technology is invading everything, and to throw our balance sheet behind that. They've been tangibly successful at it."
The duo's commitment to improving the firm's diversity statistics is also lauded. A&O has made a number of pushes recently, including expanding its reverse mentoring scheme and a pilot launch of a remote working hub in Vauxhall, as part of a renewed push to boost gender diversity at the firm.
One partner says: "Wim and Andrew have both made a big push in diversity. They've been firmer with partners on how we meet targets. It's great to see their unrelenting focus on that."
A move as transformative as an O'Melveny merger would clearly require a partnership's faith in its leadership, and in Dejonghe and Ballheimer's case, this connection seems fairly solid – though not without the odd crack.
A former London partner says: "I really like Wim. He's a very straightforward, honest guy and I trust him. I had a favourable impression of Andrew, and he's well liked."
The ex-partner adds that Dejonghe recently travelled to Hong Kong to attend an A&O partner's funeral, stating: "He's incredibly dedicated. He would never miss an event like that."
However, one current partner claims Dejonghe is "not good" at listening to people, and can be "a bit of a dictator", though concedes: "Most successful leaders often are – you can't be weak."
The current partner adds: "Andrew is a good guy. Neither of them are very visible – but if they were walking corridors they wouldn't be able to do their day jobs."
At the time of the pair's elections in 2016, all contenders for the positions highlighted the need for US expansion. When Dejonghe and Ballheimer won, they shouldered that responsibility. Sources for this piece consistently state the duo will be "defined" by the outcome of the ongoing discussions.
As one German former partner bluntly remarks: "Wim and Andrew have put all their eggs in this basket. Their personal fate depends on the success of this project."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss Says Progress Means 'Embracing the Uncomfortable Reality'
5 minute readGCs Say They are Getting 'Edged Out' of UK Boardrooms
Trending Stories
- 1In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
- 2A Simple 'Trial Lawyer' Goes to the Supreme Court
- 3Clifford Chance Adds Skadden Rainmaker in London
- 4Latham, Kirkland and Paul Weiss Climb UK M&A Rankings
- 5Goodwin Hires Quinn Emanuel Partner to Launch Office in Brussels
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250