SRA weighs up SDT referral for Dentons over dismissal of pregnant employee
Regulator considers SDT referral over employment discrimination dispute with former HR manager
October 31, 2018 at 07:13 AM
2 minute read
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is considering referring Dentons to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT), after the firm dismissed a pregnant staff member last year.
The employment discrimination case, which was heard last year, was brought by Bina Hale, a former recruitment manager in the firm's Milton Keynes office, who claimed after being fired in January 2017 that she was unfairly dismissed and discriminated against for going on maternity leave.
An employment tribunal ruled in favour of Hale last December, stating that there had been no consultation with her prior to the decision being made, and that she was "pre-selected" for redundancy as she had been on maternity leave.
The SRA subsequently opened an investigation into Dentons and the regulator has confirmed that it is now considering referring the firm to the SDT, though no individual lawyers are facing further investigation.
A spokesperson for Dentons said: "We are pleased that all the individuals named in this matter have been cleared by the SRA from further investigation and prosecution. However, we are disappointed the SRA is considering referring the firm to the SDT, based solely on the fact of the employment tribunal's original judgment, as we are committed to a working environment free of discrimination."
Earlier this year, Dentons said it had conducted an internal investigation to ensure that the staff named in the decision had not behaved improperly.
"Diversity and inclusion, as well as the highest standards of professionalism, are both very important priorities for the firm," Dentons said. "Earlier this year we reviewed our maternity policy to ensure it is aligned with market best practice, and we have also enhanced our family-friendly policies to support working parents in various ways with both work-related and personal family challenges."
A spokesperson for the SRA said its work on this matter continues.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPogust Goodhead Set to Axe Roles as Accounts Remain Overdue
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250