The productivity problem: why are lawyers working longer hours in the age of innovation?
New research has found that despite much-heralded efficiencies offered by new technology, the number of hours lawyers are working is actually increasing
November 21, 2018 at 12:00 AM
4 minute read
Data from legal recruitment firm Douglas Scott's annual salary survey – which polled more than 3,000 legal professionals – has found that lawyers are working longer hours than ever before, yet productivity remains a challenge for many firms. In this article, Douglas Scott founder Kathryn Riley looks at what law firms can do to embrace innovation and tackle the productivity puzzle
Artificial intelligence, automation and other new technologies are propelling the legal industry forwards, bringing that elusive work/life balance ever closer. Yet despite this continued innovation, productivity remains a core challenge, as evidenced in NatWest's 2018 Legal Benchmarking Report.
However, we know that subdued productivity is not symptomatic of work ethic or commitment, the legal industry being populated as it is by high-achievers who work tremendously hard.
Our latest salary survey supports this sentiment, revealing that legal professionals are working an average of 6.21 hours per week longer than their contracted hours – an increase on 2017's average of five hours and 2016's average of 5.76 hours. Though this adds almost an entire day onto the working week, some will no doubt be surprised to hear that this figure isn't even higher – I don't doubt that there are some professionals working significantly more hours within a typical week.
While this commitment is a real positive for the industry, we know that working longer hours doesn't always guarantee quality output. It's therefore encouraging to see that firms are recognising this, with a continued focus across the board on supporting professionals to work in a more flexible way. Our data shows an increase in flexible working, with flexi-time now forming part of the benefits package of more than a quarter of legal professionals.
Talent
Those on top are taking the most strategic approach to recruitment and retention; it's no longer simply about filling roles but about finding the people who will shape the future of a law firm. New technologies and demand for emerging skills are changing the focus, although finding the right balance between people, purpose and culture remains paramount.
The old blueprint has been replaced by an agile approach – where once a rigid structure would typically be the norm within most firms, those that are thriving tend to be diverse and nimble, yet clear in approach. Firms must remain focused on a clear recruitment and retention strategy, with a flexible structure and a willingness to think outside the box.
Technology
Successful firms will continue to embrace advances in technology – conversations around robots replacing professionals or making lawyers redundant, while concerning for some, are hugely short-sighted. The workplace, whatever the industry, is becoming increasingly hybrid, although trailblazers who are already utilising new technologies will reap the benefits in the long-term. It's also important to remember that talented professionals don't want to work with old technologies.
New innovations – whether technologies, systems, processes or even ethos – can increase efficiencies, improve accuracy and even enhance client service, but only if it's ingrained within a firm's operations and culture. Getting this right is key for law firms focused on growth and remaining competitive in an evolving industry.
And while innovation is driving operational and procedural changes, firms shouldn't overlook the many ways it can be used to support employees. Flexible and virtual working within the legal industry would have been pie in the sky a decade ago, but advancements in technology have made it a reality.
Maximising productivity can only be achieved when talent and technology meet and support one another. Will it end the long hours working culture? The jury's out, but what we do know is that those firms committed to embracing new technology and more innovative ways of working will be first port of call for top talent.
- Click here for more from Legal Ladder, our dedicated careers blog to help lawyers and recruiters keep abreast of the key issues facing the profession
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden's Big China Cuts and What They Mean for the Market
A China Practice by Any Other Name, Will It Be as Sweet?
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250