General counsel face up to worst-case Brexit scenario
With Brexit just three months away, the lack of clarity presents an unprecedented challenge for in-house lawyers
December 14, 2018 at 12:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
With Brexit just three months away, the lack of clarity presents an unprecedented challenge for in-house lawyers planning for the worst-case scenario.
Global corporate legal leaders from across Europe gathered in London last month, eager to hear the steps other companies are taking to prepare.
Beyond the political circus and the relentless doom-laden headlines, what concrete actions are companies taking, and what role can the in-house legal team play?
Monitoring developments and planning for the worst
While most global in-house legal teams identified their focal points of Brexit preparation many months ago, scenario planning continues. For example, at last month's gathering, many companies across several sectors voiced concerns about disruption to manufacturing. If they manufacture in the UK or procure product components made in the EU, the concern is delays for shipments into and out of the UK.
The continuing lack of clarity about future trade terms between the UK and EU has prompted some manufacturers to stockpile inventory to avoid manufacturing disruptions.
Many companies mentioned holding off on investment decisions in the UK. Some have already opened offices elsewhere. When the 'divorce terms' are finally clarified, outside counsel are likely to see a significant increase in demand for Brexit advice. Clients will want counsel to help identify and evaluate options, so they can prioritise actions and decide mitigation steps for risks specific to their industry sector and their supply chain.
"We're considering various scenarios," said Michael Going, the Chicago-based chief compliance officer and corporate secretary of capital goods multinational CNH Industrial. "We are planning as if it may be a hard Brexit, but we hope reasonable minds in the UK and EU prevail and we have something much less potentially disruptive."
Brexit uncertainty makes UK employees nervous
At the discussion in London, several UK-based general counsel noted increasing concerns over potential disruption or chaos when the country officially exits the EU in March next year.
They are thinking through ways to avoid distraction or even disruption at work in a no-deal Brexit. It's plausible that daily access to many goods and services could become difficult, and employees are increasingly asking 'what if?' questions.
Many legal leaders are part of multidisciplinary Brexit committees in their organisations. Such committees are often led by the COO or chief risk officer. The cross-functional teams consider what the potential Brexit implications may be and what actions should be taken – and at what cost – to address the potential negative effects.
One general counsel of a global company said her trade compliance team is actively assessing the implications of the worst-case scenario – a hard Brexit – and options to mitigate the potential financial and operational impact to their businesses.
Francesco Giobbe, group general counsel of MBDA, a defence industry leader in Europe with nearly 1,500 UK-based employees, shared important concerns about which MBDA has turned to law firms for advice. "The major issues are the eligibility of our group to access EU funds for research and development, because one of our three shareholders is a British plc, and the treatment of IP developed with these EU funds in our cooperative programmes between our three EU-based subsidiaries and the British one," Giobbe explained.
According to Giobbe, MBDA's in-house team worked with finance, HR and programmes functions to conduct a joint analysis of the financial impact of a hard Brexit situation on taxes, customs and employee travel across the channel.
Some companies are in businesses that feel less likely to experience a big Brexit impact. Daragh Fagan, group general counsel and company secretary of FTSE 100 company Rentokil Initial, said: "We updated our review for the board a couple of months ago, but have not kept looking at it through all the twists and turns of the news cycle. Largely, our business is insulated by being local-to-local services with limited cross-border travel or product shipping, etc."
Fagan said the main impact his companies see is tightening of the labour market in the UK for frontline staff. He added: "We have done some selected, small-scale inventory building in a few countries and in our European warehouses in case of short-term disruption around 29 March 2019."
E Leigh Dance consults with large, global, corporate legal and compliance leaders and their teams on managing changes in legal service delivery, responding to multi-jurisdiction regulation and strategic priorities in digital transformation. She divides her time between bases in New York and Brussels. Two of the three leaders quoted in this article are members of the Global Counsel Leaders Circle, which Dance founded and directs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Labour's New Budget Steady the Ship? Big Moves On UK Tax Reform and Fiscal Stability
5 minute readMexico's Judicial Reforms and the Implications for Foreign Investors
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250