What will law firms look like in 2049?
HSF CEO Mark Rigotti looks back over 30 years in law and predicts the changes to come in the next three decades
January 03, 2019 at 06:33 AM
5 minute read
Predicting the future can be a tall order, especially for lawyers that are trained to follow precedent when dispensing advice. The political and economic events of recent years have been hard to foresee and the ongoing impact of President Donald Trump and Brexit will make 2019 no less volatile or easier to navigate.
Yet one of the certainties about leading a global organisation is that change is going to happen. What guides me every day at Herbert Smith Freehills is the idea that tomorrow will not be the same as today. The pace of technological advance means our people need to be more responsive than ever in understanding innovation and how it can improve the service we offer our clients.
Sometimes the future fails to deliver. A group of futurologists consulted in 1989 are still waiting for the UK's north-south economic divide to disappear, the three-day week – and everyone to be wearing jumpsuits…
But even if the timing is sometimes off and some predictions are wilder than others, we can sense the direction in which technology is carrying us. So much money is being invested in driverless vehicles, it is no surprise their proliferation in 30 years' time is a common expectation. A bigger leap of faith is the nanotechnology foreshadowed in The Matrix movies that could link microchipped humans to the cloud so we can download whatever information is relevant to us. And longer working lives seem unavoidable if advances in healthcare mean that disease can be diagnosed remotely before symptoms show themselves.
In looking forward 30 years to what lawyers in the early years of their careers today will encounter, I think back over the same timeframe to my first day at the firm in 1988.
The first stop on my introductory tour was to see Ms Wickenden, the librarian, who kept vast reams of information at her fingertips. Then I looked in on the huge mainframe computer humming away in an air-conditioned room with its own power source. My third and final stop was to see the fax room, where 42 fax machines were transmitting and receiving documents non-stop. Fast forward 30 years and there are no libraries, no mainframes, no fax machines.
So what will law firms look like in 2049? We have some clues today, particularly how a lawyer's role will change. As well as keeping on top of their technical area of specialism, they will have to strengthen their broader range of skills to maintain the mantle of trusted business adviser. We already see that with the wider set of professionals we have in helping to serve clients roles, including project managers, technology specialists and pricing experts in our legal operations team.
Technology is doing away with the paper trail and much more commodity work will be standardised or outsourced. Artificial intelligence is simplifying data discovery so that we can spend more time collaborating with our clients. First-touch interface will be handled and perhaps mediated by virtual helpers.
Some transactional practices – such as conveyancing, licensing technology, equity raising – are likely to change as technology creates new, more efficient marketplaces on which our clients transact business.
In its place, lawyers will do what they have always done and hunt out the next wave of economic change, which could come from tougher international regulators, the emerging laws that will govern big data and privacy, climate change-induced developments and the global clients already rising in Asia.
Another big shift will be lawyers' approach to risk and return. I can see a time when law firms become more willing to use their balance sheets and set up their own 'in-house' funds to help finance claims. Larger funding requirements may lead to the stockmarket listing of several of the largest firms – creating the side-benefit of share options to tie in the brightest and best.
These trends are unlikely to lead to a one-size-fits-all model. Despite the questions being asked about the scale of some of the accounting firms, I think law firms are a long way off reaching their size limits. More growth and mergers are a given for those with global aspirations. The accounting firms aspire to grow their legal practices, so competition is not going to lessen. But there is still space for boutique specialists – startups with no legacy costs. There will be more of these that, along with client needs, will force the larger firms to look again at their efficiency.
What will not change 30 years from now is that success is heavily anchored on the clients and the talent that each firm can attract, retain and build sustainable relationships with.
Will my vision prove to be right? Come and ask me in 2049. Despite the unpredictability that 2019 will bring, I know that the future for the forward-thinking law firms starts here.
Mark Rigotti is CEO of Herbert Smith Freehills.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat to Expect From Teresa Ribera, the EU‘s New Competition Commissioner
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250