Apple general counsel's first-year earnings revealed in SEC filing
Multimillion-dollar salary, stock options and non-equity incentives revealed in proxy statement
January 11, 2019 at 12:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Apple general counsel Kate Adams' earnings in her first year at the tech giant have been revealed in a US Securities and Exchange Commission filing.
The company's 2019 proxy statement, filed this week, has revealed that her base salary for 2018 was $1m (£786,000), but because of a 53-week financial year in 2017, her 2018 salary is listed on the statement as $884,615 (£695,000).
However, she also earned $4m (£3.1m) in non-equity incentive compensation, the maximum total payout for her annual cash incentive.
With about $5m (£3.9m) in total cash compensation, Adams earned more than most of the GCs listed in Legal Week sister title Corporate Counsel's 2018 GC Compensation Survey, breaking into the top 10.
According to the filing, Adams' annual cash incentive was boosted because Apple's executives exceeded the maximum performance goals for both net sales and operating income.
Apple reported net sales of $265.6bn and an operating income of $70.9bn in 2018, both numbers representing a year-on-year increase of 16%, according to the filing. Last week, Apple CEO Tim Cook lowered the company's quarterly revenue forecast due to slow iPhone sales in China.
"We believe the compensation paid to our named executive officers for 2018 appropriately reflects and rewards their contribution to our performance," Apple said in the filing, which was signed by Adams.
Adams also received $21,509,765 (£16,901,000) in stock awards and $306,280 (£241,000) in other compensation, including Apple's contributions to her 401(k) plan and relocation expenses. She joined the company in November 2017 from US consumer conglomerate Honeywell, where she was senior vice-president and general counsel.
"[Restricted stock units] awards with time-based vesting align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our shareholders by promoting the stability and retention of a high-performing executive team over the longer term," the filing said.
Five other Apple executive officers, including Cook, had their compensations outlined in the filing. All listed executives had a base salary of $1m, except Cook, whose base was $3m. The executives' base salaries were about the same in 2017.
According to the filing, the executives' compensation packages are determined by a board of independent directors.
The directors use risk reports provided by Adams and other members of Apple's risk oversight committee when creating compensation packages. They also consider Cook's evaluations of other Apple executives, a compensation consultant's advice and the compensation of peers at other tech companies, including Alphabet, Amazon.com, Facebook and Intel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRivals Seize Opportunity as A&O Shearman, Hogan Lovells Vacate South Africa
5 minute readSwiss Lawyers Sanctioned by U.S. Treasury Over Russia Denounce 'Political' Accusations
3 minute readExclusive: Mayer Brown Shutters Mexico City Office, Lawyers Scatter
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250