Linklaters reports ethnicity pay gap data as gender gap narrows
Firm files figures ahead of potential new mandatory reporting requirements
January 21, 2019 at 09:39 AM
4 minute read
Linklaters has revealed its ethnicity pay gap alongside its latest gender pay gap data, ahead of the potential introduction of new mandatory reporting requirements for businesses.
The firm – which last year was the first of the magic circle to file its gender pay gap report – has released figures which show that across the whole firm, including equity partners, the firm has a 30.3% ethnicity pay gap on a mean basis, and a 0% gap on a median basis.
Eighty-three percent of the firm's UK workforce disclosed their ethnicity for the report, of who 21% are black, Asian or minority ethnic (BAME).
The report also reveals details of the ethnicity pay gap broken down by pay quartiles. The gap is most pronounced among the top quartile of earners at 21.2%, while in the bottom quartile, the gap is 1% in favour of BAME employees.
The firm said the decision to report its ethnicity pay gap had been taken "in line with our strategy to increase the representation of BAME colleagues at all levels in the firm".
After the first year of mandatory gender pay gap reporting, the UK Government announced last year that it was considering introducing similar requirements for ethnicity data, launching a three-month consultation in October.
Responses to the consultation – which closed on 11 January – are currently being analysed as the government weighs up what disclosures should be made mandatory "to allow for meaningful action".
Last year, Allen & Overy also included ethnicity pay gap figures in its reporting, revealing a mean pay gap of 22.8% for BAME staff in 2017 and 21.6% for 2018.
For the first year of gender pay gap reporting, law firms were not required to include partners but following widespread calls for greater transparency, many have since opted to do so, including Linklaters, which voluntarily disclosed its partner pay gap at the end of March.
This year, the firmwide pay gap at Linklaters has narrowed from 44.2% to 37% on a median basis, although the mean average increased slightly from 60.3% to 61.1%.
The firm's top quartile of earners is less male than it was last year, with the proportion of women in the top quartile increasing from 37% to 41%.
Linklaters' pay gap excluding partners – which all law firms with more than 250 employees are required to report – has also improved on last year, with average hourly pay for men now 20.8% in favour of men, down from 23.2%, and the median average down from 39.1% to 33.9%.
Last year, a report by the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee into the effectiveness of the first year of gender pay gap reporting described the exclusion of partners from the first round of reporting as making "a nonsense" of efforts to tackle the pay gap.
Law firms and other limited liability partnerships had not been required to include partner remuneration in their calculations as they are not technically employees, but clamour has since grown to make it compulsory for firms to include them in future.
Discussions over how to introduce a standardised approach to including partners have since taken place, with Clifford Chance and Pinsent Masons meeting with Law Society president Christina Blacklaws last year to look at how to encourage more transparency.
For more, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore than Half of South Australian Lawyers Report Suffering Harassment
3 minute readKing & Spalding, Weil, Gotshal & Manges Launch Pro Bono Legal Initiative for Tennis Players
2 minute readTrump Ordered to Pay Legal Bill Within 28 Days After Rejecting Costs Order
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250