'You can't drive change if you don't drive relationships' – rebuilding trust between firms and clients
Why in-house lawyers need to move away from 'transactional' interactions with firms and build trust-based relationships
January 24, 2019 at 06:06 AM
4 minute read
In-house legal teams need to move away from "transactional" interactions with law firms and build relationships based on trust, according to Barclays managing director and head of external engagement Stephanie Hamon.
Hamon was speaking at the CLOC London Institute 2019, the organisation's second UK gathering of in-house legal operations professionals, after the event launched in London last year.
Her remarks came on day two of the conference, in a session entitled 'From Cost Centre to Strategic Enabler', during which she focused on how lawyers can rediscover the value of trust.
She said: "When I started at Barclays, my GC told me that he wanted us to change the client-law firm dynamic. But you can't drive change if you don't drive relationships, so I decided to change my legal panel model from a transactional-based one to a relationship-based one."
Hamon said she uses various frameworks to measure the value that different law firms give to Barclays, and how efficiently each law firm delivers their services to the company.
She uses these measurements in discussions with her legal advisers on how they can improve working together. This in turn gives law firms the opportunity to demonstrate the value they believe they are giving to the company and to say what they feel they are getting out of the relationship.
"However, when we started with the relationship-based model," said Hamon, "we found there was a lack of trust in our existing relationships. Even some of the law firms we had been working with for decades didn't trust us completely. So how do you bring trust back into the relationship? The problem came down to the fact that our expectations of our key law firms were never really properly articulated and feedback on those [was not] provided candidly."
This trust can be re-established through more conversations between law firms and their clients, greater transparency, and the sharing of ideas and data, she explained.
Meanwhile, during a separate panel discussion on 'Creating and Maximising the Value of a Legal Ops Function In a Rapidly Changing Legal Ecosystem', former Royal Mail GC Maaike de Bie encouraged law firms to pick up the phone and talk to their clients more often.
De Bie, who is joining Easyjet as GC this March, said: "Lawyers are afraid to fail and afraid to make mistakes, so they always feel they have to come to us with ready-made answers. This in turn means that when they see a change on the horizon, they rarely just pick up the phone and have a conversation about the issues this change may mean for us, and how they as a law firm may be able to help think it through with us."
De Bie was joined on the panel by WW Legal Operations vice-president and deputy general counsel Aine Lyons, and Sky deputy group general counsel Vicky Sandry.
While talking about the much-touted rise of the legal operations function, the trio also discussed the need to evolve legal culture.
Sandry said: "At Sky, we've got an objective to work smarter not harder, because we can't work any harder. It's about trusting people so they can work in ways that best work for them and for the business. This means having a strong flexible-working system that recognises trust."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe British Legal Awards 2024: Who Won What and Why—Transactional Awards
Kenya to Host Inaugural African Legal Technology & Innovation Awards in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250