Venezuela President Nicolas Maduro and opposition leader Juan GuaidóArnold & Porter and Venable Clash Over Rightful Venezuelan Leadership in U.S. Court
After Arnold & Porter began working for Venezuelan Opposition President Juan Guiadó, Venable started representing Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.
March 01, 2019 at 11:04 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
The fight over who is the rightful President of Venezuela has spilled over into a U.S. courtroom, as two Big law firms vie to represent the Venezuelan Government.
Arnold & Porter ceased representing Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and began representing Venezuelan Opposition President Juan Guiadó after the United States recognised Guiadó as the leader of Venezuela. After Arnold & Porter switched sides, Venable stepped in and began representing Maduro.
The two firms are now quarreling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, as each claims they represent the rightful head of Venezuela. Arnold & Porter and Venable did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
On February 12, Arnold & Porter attorneys asked for a stay in a case regarding a demand by a Canadian gold producer for compensation tied to Venezuela's expropriation of its property.
"A stay is necessary to allow the newly installed government of Juan Guaidó, Interim President of the Republic, sufficient time to evaluate its position in this and other cases involving the Republic currently pending in U.S. courts," the firm said in the court filing.
The motion was granted on February 14.
On February 22, Venable filed a response to the motion for a stay on behalf of Venezuela's Attorney General of the Republic, Reinaldo Muñoz Pedroza. In the court filings submitted by Venable attorneys Moxila Upadhyaya and Michael MacWilliams, the firm disputed Arnold & Porter's assertion that they are the rightful legal representatives of Venezuela.
"[W]hile the Republic does not oppose the stay that has been granted, it strenuously objects to Arnold & Porter's position that the Republic has no right to participate in these proceedings by virtue of President Trump's official statement," Venable said in the court filing.
The firm also added that "[w]hile there is well-established law about" whether an unrecognised state is entitled to certain privileges and immunities, it has never been suggested that an unrecognised state may not defend itself when "hauled into court".
On February 28, Arnold & Porter attorneys Kent Yalowitz and E Whitney Debevoise moved to strike the response to the motion of stay, disputing Venable's claim to rightful representation of Venezuela.
Arnold & Porter has long represented Venezuelan leaders, dating back to 1984, according to U.S. Department of Justice filings under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The firm jumped to Guiadó after U.S. President Donald Trump and 30 countries recognized Guiadó as the de facto leader of Venezuela.
Venable has represented a variety of interests in Hong Kong, Venezuela and Malaysia since at least 2009, according to FARA filings.
|Similar stories
Arnold & Porter Registers as Lobbyist for Venezuelan Opposition President
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
New Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute read
Travers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute read
Japan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
