Simmons Secures High Court Victory For Ex-Olympus Boss
The High Court heard evidence from a Slaughter and May partner in the long-running case against ex-Olympus CEO Michael Woodford.
March 12, 2019 at 06:26 AM
3 minute read
Simmons & Simmons has successfully defended ex-Olympus Corporation president Michael Woodford in a High Court case lasting almost a year, over allegations brought by a subsidiary of the Japanese camera maker that he had been involved in pensions irregularities.
Olympus Corporation subsidiary KeyMed, a medical and industrial equipment company, claimed that the defendants – Woodford and his colleague, former director Paul Hillman – had conspired to maximise their own pension benefits while acting as trustees of the company's pension scheme, to the detriment of the wider organisation and its employees, breaching their duty of care.
KeyMed turned to Fieldfisher and Wilberforce Chambers' John Wardell QC, Andrew Mold and Tim Matthewson for advice.
They argued that between 2004 and 2007, Woodford and Hillman failed to account for KeyMed's interests and used their powers "in bad faith" for the "improper purpose of improving their own personal position".
Woodford joined KeyMed in 1981 and then rose rapidly through the ranks, becoming president and CEO of the parent company in 2011, but was dismissed from the role that same year after he blew the whistle when the company made payments of nearly £1 billion to purported advisers, which were later shown to be fraudulent.
A year later, he brought a £38 million unfair dismissal claim against the company, which Olympus adviser Slaughter and May helped settle out of court.
As part of the KeyMed case, Fieldfisher sought evidence from Slaughters partner Ewan Brown, who is a longstanding adviser to parent company Olympus – and acted alongside it in the two-year Serious Fraud Office investigation that followed Woodford's allegations.
In the current case, Simmons – which brought in Brick Court Chambers heavyweights Simon Salzedo QC, Paul Newman QC and Stephen Midwinter QC – convinced the court that Woodford and Hillman had not acted dishonestly.
In a judgment handed down yesterday (March 11), the judge, Mr Justice Marcus Smith, concluded there was no improper conduct and, though there were certain failings in the establishment of the company's executive pension scheme, there was no evidence the pair had acted dishonestly.
Woodford has used regular adviser Simmons for a number of years. He is particularly close with the law firm after becoming a member of its board in 2014.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPogust Goodhead Set to Axe Roles as Accounts Remain Overdue
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250