Allen & Overy and O'Melveny Hone In On Key Merger Terms
Prospect of a successful deal edges closer as firms look to finalise name and pay structure for the combined outfit.
March 13, 2019 at 07:46 AM
3 minute read
U.K. magic circle firm Allen & Overy and U.S. West Coast litigation leader O'Melveny & Myers are edging towards an historic tie-up, with the final stage of discussions narrowing in on a few key terms.
Management teams from each firm have spent recent months thrashing out the detail of a possible deal, with a number of conditions now expected to be agreed within weeks, according to several people with knowledge of the talks.
Key terms currently being discussed include the combined firm's name and how its pay system would be structured.
One person said that a merged firm is expected to operate one profit pool. A combined firm is likely to run an amalgamation of the two firms' systems in a flexible lock step style, which would have greater flexibility at the top in order to retain and attract stellar talent, the person said.
A&O's standard lockstep ladder runs from 20-50 points, taking 15 years to reach the plateau. However, the firm introduced a bonus pool for star performers in 2014 and broke lockstep to hire a number of finance partners in New York in 2016.
The combined firm's name is also being discussed. A number of hybrids of the duo's names have been registered online, including allenomelveny.com, omelvenyallen.com, aom.com, aomm.com and allenmyers.com. It is not known whether those names were registered by the firms.
A formal proposal document is yet to be sent to both firms' partnerships, but Allen & Overy partners have been sent memos and can access information about the proposed terms online, several people have said.
No date has yet been set for a vote on the merger, and people at both firms are keen to stress that while talks have progressed to a late stage, a tie-up is not guaranteed.
People have previously speculated that it would make sense for a vote to take place following the distribution of profits to partners.
One person said high voting thresholds were required to get each side to agree. But positive momentum is building within the A&O partnership, according to one current and several former partners.
A partner at one of the firms added that following meetings between partners at both firms, they felt there was a good cultural fit between the two sides.
Last month, O'Melveny announced record financial results. Gross revenue at the firm increased by 8.5 percent, climbing just past the $800 million mark. The firm's revenue per lawyer rose 6.4 percent to hit $1.19 million, while a 12.6 percent increase in profits per equity partner (PEP) brought that figure to $2.26 million.
A&O has not yet announced its results as its financial year runs to 30 April 2019. Last year it added $70.7 million to its top line to reach $2.05 billion, while PEP also saw the same percentage increase to hit $2.2 billion.
Legal Week revealed the pair were in merger talks last April, before revealing subsequent meetings between partners in Frankfurt and Singapore.
With reporting by Paul Hodkinson
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoodwin's Singapore Private Equity Partner Leaves to Join Key Client Hillhouse Investment
Trending Stories
- 1The Intersection of Labor Law and Politics Following the Presidential Election
- 2Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: LA Judge Orders Edison to Preserve Wildfire Evidence, Is Kline & Specter Fight With Thomas Bosworth Finally Over?
- 3What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
- 4Federal Court Considers Blurry Lines Between Artist's Consultant and Business Manager
- 5US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250