Baker McKenzie Sets Target for London BAME Workforce in Latest Pay Gap Report
The firm is among few to release its ethnicity pay gap.
March 21, 2019 at 08:28 AM
2 minute read
Baker McKenzie is aiming to boost the amount of black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) employees across its London office, targeting a 14 percent workforce make-up.
The firm has not set a date to achieve this level of representation, which was announced in its gender pay gap report, released today (21 March).
Based on a snapshot figure taken in April 2018, there was a mean 17 percent and median 34 percent hourly pay gap for the firm's BAME employees, excluding partners. In the same group, there was a 34 percent mean and 48 percent median bonus gap.
Some 67 percent of partners disclosed their ethnicity for the report, which found that of that group, the firm has a 7 percent mean and no median ethnicity pay gap. The firm's London office employees, including partners, have a 60 percent mean pay gap and 62 percent bonus gap.
The report states: "We will be working towards achieving (or maintaining) as a minimum, 14% BAME representation through all levels of the firm, with a specific focus on partnership and senior leadership levels.
"We are realistic that these measures might take time to take effect – meaningful and lasting change doesn't happen overnight – but we are determined to make progress, and believe we have the right initiatives in place to do so."
The firm also reported its partner pay gap for the first time.
Its total partnership has a mean gender pay gap is 14 percent, while its median gap is 30 percent. However, female partners fare better when it comes to bonuses, as the mean calculation shows women receive 26 percent more in bonuses, and no gap based on median figures.
Across all levels of employee at the office however, the mean gender pay gap is 51 percent in favour of men, alongside a mean bonus gap of 68 percent.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHengeler Advises On €7B Baltica 2 Wind Farm Deal Between Ørsted and PGE
2 minute readA&O Shearman To Lose Another Five Lawyers, Including Madrid Practice Head, to EY
3 minute readRosenblatt Breaks Away From RBG, Becomes 40-Strong Standalone Firm
Trending Stories
- 1How I Made Managing Partner: 'Be the Uniting Voice of the Firm,' Says George Ogilvie of McDonald Carano
- 2People in the News—Jan. 31, 2025—Eastburn and Gray, Fox Rothschild
- 3Exits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
- 4Etsy App Infringes on Storage, Retrieval Patents, New Suit Claims
- 5The Secret Prior Art Problem Rears Its Ugly Head
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250