Gender Pay Gap Favours Women at Hogan Lovells, Eversheds
Hogan Lovells has also released its ethnicity pay gap data.
April 02, 2019 at 08:26 AM
2 minute read
Hogan Lovells has paid its U.K. female partners more than their male counterparts for the second year in a row, while Eversheds Sutherland's female equity partners also took home more than their male counterparts in 2018.
Based on mean average figures, Hogan Lovells paid its U.K. female partners 2.1 percent more last year, marginally lower than the previous figure of 2.8 percent. As of the beginning of 2019, women made up 27 percent of the firm's U.K. partnership.
Slightly more women than men at the firm received a bonus last year – 51.4 percent compared to 49.1 percent.
When partner figures are combined with employee numbers, however, the gender pay gap at the firm stands at 12.3 percent in favour of men and the median gap is 27.3 percent.
The firm also reported its ethnicity pay gap data for the first time, measuring a mean ethnicity pay gap for combined employees and partners of 46.3 percent and a median gap of 33.2 percent. For partners, the mean ethnicity pay gap is 12.8 percent.
Meanwhile Eversheds Sutherland has also released its U.K. pay gap data for 2018.
Female equity partners were paid 6.2 percent more than male equity partners during the year, compared to the firm paying 4.09 percent more to its male equity partnership the previous year.
The median pay difference for the same demographic for 2018 was 14 percent in favour of women.
But male fixed-share partners were paid a mean average of 3.16 percent more than their female counterparts.
When the data was collected in April 2018, Eversheds' partnership was made up of 294 partners, of which 27 percent were female and 73 percent male according to the firm.
The mean pay difference between all male and female employees in the firm's U.K. arm, including partners, was 58.3 percent while the median pay gap was 39.62 percent.
More women across the firm's U.K. fixed-share partnership and other employees received a bonus than men, with 51.2 percent of women taking home a bonus compared to 47.7 percent of men.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAustralia’s MinterEllison Loses More Partners From Canberra Practice
2 minute readMore Than 2 Dozen Lawyers Break Off From DLA Piper Affiliate in Brazil to Form New Firm
Trending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250