A Cautionary Tale of the NQ Who Became a NPM (Not Partner Material)
A legal recruiter warns against shunning the call of the market.
April 03, 2019 at 12:01 AM
3 minute read
It is easy to become pigeonholed as a newly qualified lawyer. Imagine the following scenario.
A student gains a graduate diploma in law, completes her legal practice course and then serves a further two years of training and is finally ready to take her first step into a firm.
In her first five years, she spends most of her time working on restructurings rather than deals because of the financial crisis, but the market then starts to change and M&A and IPOs pick up. During those years, she received multiple calls from legal recruitment consultants but ignored them. She was enjoying the firm, even though she was getting home at 11pm each night.
She appreciates that she rarely sees her friends. Most of them are lawyers in other firms but she is always too busy to make it to any of their get-togethers. But it is OK, as the word 'partnership' had been mentioned occasionally in appraisals, albeit in the distant future.
A few years later however, she is asked to attend a meeting with two of the partners in the corporate team – she is told there are no partnership options for her at the firm as she has failed to demonstrate any business development capability.
She thinks about some friends who had been in contact with recruitment consultants, who are now well en route to partnership at smaller firms. She decides to contact a recruitment agency but is told: "I'm afraid you're too far along, if you'd thought about moving earlier in your career, we could've helped."
She calls a few more agencies and receives the same answer. Suddenly she feels trapped. Her passion was to deal with multiple clients, so switching career paths to become an in-house lawyer is not an attractive proposition.
She interviews with a few firms but without a portable book of business they are not prepared to take the risk. Two years later, she leaves the legal profession.
Such a cautionary tale highlights the dangers of not considering your long-term prospects at the very outset of your career, as well as not using the network open to you.
It is important to attempt to gain experience in a variety of areas and to constantly evaluate whether your firm is the right place for your career ambitions. A failure to do so can easily leave you wondering what might have been.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden's Big China Cuts and What They Mean for the Market
A China Practice by Any Other Name, Will It Be as Sweet?
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250