EU and US to Begin Trade Talks Amid Heightened Tariff Threats
Global trade lawyers say their EU clients are concerned because of the uncertainty surrounding U.S. trade policy.
April 15, 2019 at 03:26 PM
3 minute read
The European Union has agreed to start negotiations with the United States to head off a trade dispute threatened by U.S. President Donald Trump.
EU ministers on Monday authorised the European Commission to work with the U.S. on two deals to eliminate tariffs on industrial goods and to recognise each other's conformity assessments. The decision to launch negotiations comes after Trump threatened last year to hit the EU with punitive tariffs, especially on the export of cars mainly from Germany, because of the country's trade surplus with the U.S.
Trump threatened to impose tariffs of 20 percent on imports of German cars unless the EU struck a trade deal.
"This is a welcome decision that will help ease trade tensions," said Cecilia Malmström, the EU's trade commissioner. "We are now ready to start formal talks for these two targeted agreements that will bring tangible benefits for people and economies on both sides of the Atlantic. I am convinced that breaking down barriers to trade between us can be win-win."
The deals cover only tariffs on industrial goods. Agricultural products are excluded – the two governments announced last July that they had reached an agreement to negotiate a trade deal on certain goods, but that these did not include farm products. Congress is now insisting that the deal should cover farm products. Tariffs on industrial products are generally quite low, about 3 percent on average, while farm goods benefit from tariffs of about 23 percent.
"Agriculture will certainly not be part of these negotiations, this is a red line for Europe," Malmstrom said during a news conference Monday.
France voted against the decision to give the commission authority to negotiate, while Belgium abstained.
Getting a deal on conformity assessment would reduce the costs for businesses of getting new products tested and certified safe for sale and use in the EU and the U.S. At the moment, the two sides have different rules and procedures for electrical, mechanical and engineering goods, including automotive parts and medical devices.
A Brussels-based trade lawyer said there was "a lot of concern" among EU clients because of the uncertainty around U.S. trade policy. Clients wanted to see how they might be affected by tariffs imposed on their exports to the U.S. and on any diversion of trade flows because of tariffs applied to Chinese products. The lawyer said clients were expected to keep a close eye on these talks as well. "We anticipate there will be questions," the lawyer said.
In a separate development, the EU will on Wednesday publish for consultation a list of U.S. exports to be targeted for tariffs in retaliation for illegal U.S. subsidies to U.S. aerospace company Boeing. The World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled last week that the U.S. had failed to remove tax breaks it had ruled illegal.
The EU estimates that the damage to its industry from the tax breaks is €20 billion ($22.6 billion). The WTO will rule later this year on its assessment of the damage.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250