EU and Canada Say They Will Fight US Sanctions on Cuba
The U.S. government announced Wednesday that as of May 2 it will allow lawsuits to go forward against companies using property confiscated by the Cuban government after the 1959 Cuban Revolution.
April 17, 2019 at 03:51 PM
3 minute read
The EU and Canada both said on Wednesday they will use all available means to defend their interests in Cuba, including a possible challenge in the World Trade Organization (WTO), after the U.S. Government announced it would allow lawsuits to go forward against companies using property confiscated by the Cuban Government after the 1959 Cuban Revolution.
The U.S. announced that it would not renew a waiver that exempted European and other companies from the effects of measures designed to deter companies from doing business in Cuba. The U.S. administration has applied the waiver, which is related to the 1996 Helms-Burton act, for more than 20 years.
"The EU will consider all options at its disposal to protect its legitimate interests, including in relation to its WTO rights and through the use of the EU Blocking Statute," the European Commission, which is responsible for the EU's international trade policy, said in a statement.
The Blocking Statute prohibits the enforcement of U.S. court judgement relating to Title III of the Helms-Burton Act within the EU, and allows EU companies sued in the U.S. to recover damages through legal proceedings against U.S. claimants before EU courts.
Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland said in a statement that Canada would also seek to use the WTO dispute-resolution process to protect Canadian companies.
"The EU and Canada consider the extraterritorial application of unilateral Cuba-related measures contrary to international law," the two countries said in a joint statement.
The Helms-Burton Act was designed to help former owners of property in Cuba whose assets were seized by the Communist government. It also was designed to deter foreign companies from investing in and doing business in Cuba, because the ownership of assets would be uncertain.
The EU argued that Helms-Burton was illegal under WTO rules because it affected entities outside U.S. territory. Following negotiations with the EU, the U.S. agreed to a waiver to avoid the act affecting European businesses. In return, the EU dropped a challenge in the WTO to the US legislation. Since the signing of the Helm-Burton Act by President Bill Clinton, every U.S. President has extended the waiver – until now.
U.S. officials said the move was made in part because of Cuba's policies supporting the authoritarian Maduro government in Venezuela.
The waiver ends on May 1, and the policy change to allow suits begins on May 2, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said.
The EU is the largest foreign investor in Cuba and the country's top export market.
One of the companies that could be affected by the U.S. decision to end the waiver is beverage company Pernod Ricard, which owns the Havana Club rum brand. The right to use the brand name is disputed by Bacardi, a Cuban family that left the country in the 1960s when the communists took control and nationalised the rum-maker.
Another is the Spanish hotel chain Meliá Hotels International SA, which has made substantial investments in Cuba.
The U.S. decision not to renew the waiver comes amid worsening trade relations between the EU and the U.S. On Wednesday, the EU published a list of U.S. exports worth $20 billion year that could be hit with penalty tariffs in a dispute over government subsidies to Boeing. The WTO ruled last week that the U.S. should have removed the illegal tax breaks and other programmes that favoured the U.S. aircraft-maker.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250