Eversheds Retakes Top Slot In Latest Brand Survey
The firm beat two magic circle firms in the overall top five, polled strongly in a range of sectors for U.K Corporates but among financial institutions the magic circle reigned supreme.
April 25, 2019 at 12:00 AM
3 minute read
Eversheds Sutherland is back on top of the annual Acritas UK Brand Index, trumping all Magic Circle firms in the 2019 survey, which asked legal services buyers which firms would get their business.
The survey, now in its 12th year, says Eversheds was the most highly favoured firm by buyers overall for its "practical and commercial" legal advice and for "perceiving the firm to offer innovative solutions".
Acritas, a specialist marketing and research group, interviewed more than 300 UK organisations and close to 200 non-UK senior counsel with revenues above £25 million, to compile data for the report.
It said Eversheds has recovered from the "post-merger dip", which can affect a firm's brand. Eversheds topped the index in 2016 and 2017, but fell to second place in 2018. Eversheds merged with US firm Sutherland Asbill & Brennan in February 2017.
The report said Eversheds brand success comes from an "increasingly respected London operation", "increased performance" of its litigation practice, and its capability across Europe and the U.S.
Magic Circle firms Linklaters and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer secured third place and fifth place, respectively. Pinsent Masons came in second and DLA Piper fourth.
U.K. firms dominated the top 20. Baker McKenzie, Squire Patton Boggs and Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP) were the only non-U.K.-based firms to feature.
A separate breakdown Acritas provided to Legal Week, comparing brand favourability across different sectors, showed Magic Circle firms still reign supreme among financial institutions, taking all five top spots.
But Eversheds and Baker McKenzie broke their grip on the largest U.K. corporates in a broad range of sectors, unseating Allen & Overy and Clifford Chance from the top five.
An Acritas spokesperson said the firms that ranked most highly were also those perceived as the most innovative by buyers – with pricing and the use of technology among their criteria.
Acritas director Jo Summers said the index showed that the UK legal market is becoming "increasingly price-sensitive" and that UK legal buyers ranked competitive pricing as a "key reason" for favouring certain firms.
Summers said this also meant buyers were more likely to choose firms that could access "cost-effective services with the same large-law quality stamp" from their national networks.
The research group said Brexit has also influenced buyers that are looking to strengthen their own presence outside the U.K. and are looking to firms they "know and trust" to provide legal support. It said it was "no surprise" that the biggest risers in this year's index were Freshfields, with its strong presence in Germany, and Squire Patton Boggs, with its US presence. Both rose five places this year: Freshfields to fifth and Squire Patton Boggs to 12th.
Acritas said its index is a reflection of which firms are "uppermost in clients' minds, whom they are most attracted to and whom they are most likely to give their work".
Interviewees were asked which firms perform best in five general areas: top-of-mind awareness, favourability, consideration for top-level litigation, consideration for major M&A and most used firms overall.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllX Ordered to Release Data by German Court Amid Election Interference Concerns
Quinn Emanuel's Hamburg Managing Partner and Four-Lawyer Team Jump to Willkie Farr
Trump ICC Sanctions Condemned as ‘Brazen Attack’ on International Law
U.S.- China Trade War: Lawyers Label WTO Dispute Pointless, Clients Have Their Hands Tied
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250