Eversheds Retakes Top Slot In Latest Brand Survey
The firm beat two magic circle firms in the overall top five, polled strongly in a range of sectors for U.K Corporates but among financial institutions the magic circle reigned supreme.
April 25, 2019 at 12:00 AM
3 minute read
Eversheds Sutherland is back on top of the annual Acritas UK Brand Index, trumping all Magic Circle firms in the 2019 survey, which asked legal services buyers which firms would get their business.
The survey, now in its 12th year, says Eversheds was the most highly favoured firm by buyers overall for its "practical and commercial" legal advice and for "perceiving the firm to offer innovative solutions".
Acritas, a specialist marketing and research group, interviewed more than 300 UK organisations and close to 200 non-UK senior counsel with revenues above £25 million, to compile data for the report.
It said Eversheds has recovered from the "post-merger dip", which can affect a firm's brand. Eversheds topped the index in 2016 and 2017, but fell to second place in 2018. Eversheds merged with US firm Sutherland Asbill & Brennan in February 2017.
The report said Eversheds brand success comes from an "increasingly respected London operation", "increased performance" of its litigation practice, and its capability across Europe and the U.S.
Magic Circle firms Linklaters and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer secured third place and fifth place, respectively. Pinsent Masons came in second and DLA Piper fourth.
U.K. firms dominated the top 20. Baker McKenzie, Squire Patton Boggs and Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP) were the only non-U.K.-based firms to feature.
A separate breakdown Acritas provided to Legal Week, comparing brand favourability across different sectors, showed Magic Circle firms still reign supreme among financial institutions, taking all five top spots.
But Eversheds and Baker McKenzie broke their grip on the largest U.K. corporates in a broad range of sectors, unseating Allen & Overy and Clifford Chance from the top five.
An Acritas spokesperson said the firms that ranked most highly were also those perceived as the most innovative by buyers – with pricing and the use of technology among their criteria.
Acritas director Jo Summers said the index showed that the UK legal market is becoming "increasingly price-sensitive" and that UK legal buyers ranked competitive pricing as a "key reason" for favouring certain firms.
Summers said this also meant buyers were more likely to choose firms that could access "cost-effective services with the same large-law quality stamp" from their national networks.
The research group said Brexit has also influenced buyers that are looking to strengthen their own presence outside the U.K. and are looking to firms they "know and trust" to provide legal support. It said it was "no surprise" that the biggest risers in this year's index were Freshfields, with its strong presence in Germany, and Squire Patton Boggs, with its US presence. Both rose five places this year: Freshfields to fifth and Squire Patton Boggs to 12th.
Acritas said its index is a reflection of which firms are "uppermost in clients' minds, whom they are most attracted to and whom they are most likely to give their work".
Interviewees were asked which firms perform best in five general areas: top-of-mind awareness, favourability, consideration for top-level litigation, consideration for major M&A and most used firms overall.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250