Paul Hastings Loses Three Hong Kong IPO Partners in Less Than a Year. Now What?
For several years, Paul Hastings benefited from a stable Hong Kong IPO practice with five core partners. Now, only two remain.
May 06, 2019 at 03:03 AM
6 minute read
Last week, former Paul Hastings partner Nan Li, a star lawyer who focused on initial public offerings in Hong Kong, started a new job at China's Tian Yuan Law Firm. He was the third Hong Kong IPO partner to leave Paul Hastings since September.
Bonnie Yung left in April to join Big Four accounting giant EY's growing affiliated Hong Kong law firm, LC Lawyers; and Steven Winegar, Paul Hastings' former Hong Kong office chair, joined China's Ping An Insurance as international general counsel last autumn.
The departures mean Paul Hastings, one of the more successful U.S. firms doing IPO work in Hong Kong, is now left with only two partners that most regularly advise on Hong Kong listings – Greater China chair Raymond Li and Hong Kong office vice-chair Zhaoyu Ren.
While Nan Li, Yung and Winegar left for their own reasons, the departures occurred at a time when Paul Hastings wanted to pull back from Hong Kong IPOs and focus on more lucrative work, such as mergers and acquisitions, according to former Paul Hastings lawyers.
"They deliberately want to keep a relatively smaller IPO team so that they can work on deals with better quality," said one former Paul Hastings lawyer, who did not wish to be identified. "They are trying to manage the deals with the team they have on hand."
Another lawyer who previously worked at the firm in Hong Kong and also asked not to be identified, agreed. "It's not a secret that IPO work is competitive in pricing, whereas M&A work, especially outbound, can charge premium rates without fee caps," the lawyer said.
The IPO team that remains is still led by some of the best. Raymond Li and Ren are both known experts in the field, and the former is considered a rainmaker for China-based deals. Also, the firm isn't hurting: last year, Paul Hastings, which was 25th on the Am Law 100 in gross revenue, ranked 18th in profits per equity partner, reporting a PEP of $3.25 million, up 12% from 2017, and nearly a 25% increase from just two years ago.
Hong Kong office chair Neil Torpey said in an emailed statement that Paul Hastings' Hong Kong IPO practice is "robust and growing", and listed eight partners working on related matters. In addition to Raymond Li and Ren, he named IPO specialists Samuel Ng and Jason Kuo, and also pointed to Hong Kong capital markets partner Vincent Wang, corporate partner Bonnie Kong and debt capital markets partners Vivian Lam and James Ma.
➤➤For more Asian Lawyer coverage, go to the Newsletters section under My Account and sign up for our weekly Asia News Alert newsletter under Legal Week. And to read more of our daily international coverage, go to https://www.law.com/legal-week/international/
But it is a well-documented fact that several U.S. firms are moving away from Hong Kong capital markets work, pressured by higher profitability targets. Firms including Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Troutman Sanders shut down their mostly Hong Kong capital markets-based China practices and left Asia entirely. Others, such as Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe and Shearman & Sterling, sought to trim down their IPO presence.
And Hong Kong's IPO market, after a boom last year, is showing signs of cooling down. During the first four months of this year, Hong Kong saw 43 new listings, according to data compiled by Hong Kong-based research firm RyanBen Capital – down from 70 in the same period last year.
"The market conditions in Hong Kong are compatible with Paul Hastings' new strategy," one of the former Paul Hastings lawyers said.
Still, the departures left a visible void in the firm's Hong Kong capital markets practice. For several years, the team regularly advised property developers and commercial banks in China on Hong Kong listings. Last year, Nan Li and Ren teamed up on Midea Real Estate Holding Ltd.'s $392 million Hong Kong IPO. Both lawyers also worked, alongside Raymond Li and Yung, on a 2017 $1 billion IPO by Zhongyuan Bank Co. Ltd. Also last year, Winegar and Nan Li advised on a $400 listing of Ascletis Pharma Inc., the first pre-revenue biotechnology company to list in Hong Kong under new listing rules.
Raymond Li, the rainmaker, is mostly responsible for bringing in the business, while the work generally has been executed by Nan Li and Yung on the Hong Kong law side and Winegar and Ren on the U.S. law side. Now, with Li, Yung and Winegar gone, Ren, who is qualified in both U.S. and Hong Kong law, is more or less the only one left from this group to execute the deals.
The firm needs someone to focus on the Hong Kong law side of IPOs, former lawyers said.
Before leaving the firm, the five core IPO partners had been practising together at Paul Hastings for more than seven years. With the exception of Raymond Li and Ren, the firm's remaining Hong Kong IPO partners are relatively new to the firm. Vincent Wang, who is also dual qualified, joined the firm in 2015 from Clifford Chance and became a partner earlier this year. Ng, a Hong Kong law specialist, and Kuo, a U.S. lawyer, both joined the firm last year, from Morrison & Foerster and Troutman Sanders, respectively.
Despite the departures, Paul Hastings maintains a sizeable office in Hong Kong with about 40 lawyers, including 14 partners, focusing on corporate, real estate and capital markets. The IPO team will likely be kept busy, former lawyers said.
Indeed, Torpey said the firm is "currently working on a dozen offerings, including three that just kicked off".
"Deals will flow Raymond's way," said one of the former Paul Hastings lawyers. "I think he will hold the fort well."
|Related Stories:
Paul Hastings Beijing Partner Leaves for China's Tian Yuan Law Firm
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Thrive in Central and Eastern Europe, Law Firms Need to 'Know the Rules of the Game'
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 2Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
- 3Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
- 4People in the News—Nov. 25, 2024—Eckert Seamans, Klehr Harrison
- 5How We Made Practice Group Chair: 'One of the Most Important Skills Is Being a Good Listener,' Say Timothy Kincaid and Brad Vaiana of Winston & Strawn
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250