Deloitte Seals New US Legal Alliance
The Big Four firm is turning to employment law and workforce management in its next law firm alliance.
May 07, 2019 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Employment law and workplace services are next on the agenda for Deloitte, as the Big Four firm strategises over how to deliver legal services in the United States to its global clients.
Nearly a year after announcing a first-of-its-kind alliance with U.S. immigration firm Berry Appleman & Leiden (BAL), it's taking a similar approach to employment issues through a new alliance with Epstein Becker Green.
Through what's formally referred to as a non-exclusive alliance, Epstein Becker attorneys will advise Deloitte's clients on the legal ramifications and related complexities of operating a workplace in the U.S., the firms are expected to announce on Tuesday.
As the alliance envisions, Deloitte will point clients toward Epstein Becker for U.S. legal work on employment and workforce-related matters, while Epstein Becker will point its clients with international employment concerns to Deloitte.
The Big Four firm's 'U.S. programme' aims to provide global legal services to U.S.-based multinationals. As it stands, a 'central team' and 'strike teams' of lawyers in their home countries work with Deloitte's tax partners and consulting partners in the U.S.
Piet Hein Meeter, global managing director of Deloitte Legal, acknowledged that Deloitte is barred from delivering legal services in the U.S. It first responded to this challenge by setting up a legal liaison desk in New York to connect the international Deloitte Legal practices to U.S. law firms as well as its own tax, consulting and advisory professionals, but that approach came up short.
"We decided we cannot cover the U.S. from one location; therefore, seeking alliances is the answer," he said. "BAL was the first step into that journey."
After immigration, Deloitte Legal identified employment law as another area of client need.
But it had to find a partner. Deloitte analysed the U.S. legal market, identifying boutiques that did not have international operations, in order to make the deal easier and deliver more synergies. Epstein Becker, a 45-year-old firm that focuses on the healthcare industry and litigation, as well as employment law, was the number one candidate and the first firm Deloitte approached. Epstein Becker was also a significant player in the immigration arena until October, when a 60-person team in New York left to open Berry Appleman's first office there.
After just two meetings in New York last fall, Deloitte and Epstein Becker were ready to commit to an alliance.
"It was pretty natural. We had existing relationships that worked with folks at Deloitte," said Epstein Becker managing partner Jim Flynn. "We were looking for additional assets overseas."
Executing the arrangement required a little more work. Deloitte had teams in 11 different countries to coordinate.
"The good news was that we had done this before in the BAL transaction, so many of these restrictions that we are all aware of had all been addressed," Meeter said. "We are very aware of but becoming more and more comfortable with those rules, and I think they are very manageable knowing that the legal services and legal activities will be done by EBG and we will focus on anything outside of the U.S."
Now, Deloitte's Meeter sees further opportunities for similar alliances in the U.S., flagging intellectual property, information technology law and privacy. "Those are areas we would like to offer clients coverage," he said.
Client Business Collaboration
Deloitte and Epstein Becker are already working on one matter together. One Deloitte client, a European manufacturing company with a plant in the U.S., is considering a range of options on what to do: closing it, reducing operations, refocusing on different manufacturing opportunities, or selling.
"It's a consulting exercise that extends into legal," Meeter said, with Epstein Becker lending expertise on the consequences of each of these potential options.
Deloitte clients will also benefit from Epstein Becker's familiarity with the panoply of regulations at the state and federal level in the U.S., according to Meeter.
"Equal pay, whistleblowing, diversity regulations: more and more things are being regulated federally or in states," he said. "We feel that type of development is a trend and we see that development coming to Europe and Asia."
Meanwhile, Flynn at Epstein Becker said the firm's U.S.-based clients with European operations and a unified system of managing employee data will likely benefit immediately from the arrangement, particularly with growing regulatory complexity on the European side.
"When you're making global workforce decisions, you want to have access to similar data and keep it in the same way," he said. "The folks in the Deloitte network can come up with an overall plan for our clients."
Other potential examples of collaboration include global corporate reorganisations, compensation and benefits design across borders, and advice on the legal risks and organisational implications of putting artificial intelligence to use in human resource matters.
Flynn and Meeter both emphasised that the "non-exclusive" nature of the alliance is both a response to technical restrictions and a recognition that under certain circumstances, clients on both sides might be better served with alternative expertise.
Financial arrangements under the alliance agreement will be addressed client by client and project by project, according to Flynn.
Epstein Becker chief operating officer Steven Di Fiore, who declined to disclose any revenue projections from the alliance, offered one longer-term reason why the alliance makes sense for the firm.
"Legal services, consulting services, risk advisory services or any professional service delivered in a silo is not what clients are looking for," said Di Fiore, who started his career at Deloitte. "Clients are looking for complete solutions to these issues that they face."
Read More:
Big Law's Trojan Horse: Are the Big Four Preparing an Invasion?
The Big Four's Big Year: Expansion, Immigration and Evaluation
PwC Forms Alliance With NY Firm, Furthering Big Four's Ambitions in Law
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore than Half of South Australian Lawyers Report Suffering Harassment
3 minute readKing & Spalding, Weil, Gotshal & Manges Launch Pro Bono Legal Initiative for Tennis Players
2 minute readTrump Ordered to Pay Legal Bill Within 28 Days After Rejecting Costs Order
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250