Report: UK Corporate Legal Leaders Would Like a Spot on the Board
Almost 40% of general counsel in Britain want to have a permanent place on their company's board of directors in the next five years, according to a report published by British law firm Shoosmiths.
May 10, 2019 at 12:59 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
It seems 36% of general counsel in Britain want to have a permanent place on their company's board of directors in the next five years, according to a report published on Thursday by U.K. law firm Shoosmiths.
The report is based on a survey sent out earlier this year by Shoosmiths and The Lawyer. The survey was sent to 224 general counsel in the U.K., with in-house teams varying from one to 10 lawyers, to those who have more than 100 lawyers on their staff. The survey was also sent to 24 CEOs and board members of British corporations to get their opinion on general counsel participation on a company's board of directors.
Stuart Little, an equity partner at Shoosmiths, said putting the general counsel on the board of directors will help give the finance people on the board an insight they perhaps have not had before.
"I think, as lawyers, we bring an interesting skillset and an interesting perspective of where we're coming from," Little said.
Despite the value of that outside of the numbers perspective, only 22% of respondents said they have a permanent spot on the board of directors. Little attributes that to the in-house role being relatively new in the U.K. and therefore the full value of a general counsel has not been realised.
"In the last 10 years, the in-house function has really grown. Before, not every organisation had an in-house function. This is a fairly new development," Little said.
The report indicates that 53% of CEOs and board members would prefer the general counsel not to have a place on the board. Little attributed that to the fact the many CEOs and board members believe the role of a general counsel is operational and view legal as just another cost. Little explained that if general counsels want a seat at the table, they are going to have to prove they deserve to be there.
"It's important for the GC to be in the room when relevant things are discussed, but to have a permanent seat – you need to justify it," Steven Colsell, a non-executive director at Starling Bank, states in the report.
Part of the hesitation on the part of board members is a lawyer's knowledge of the company's financials. More than 90% of general counsel who responded indicated that better knowledge of their organisations' financials and strategies would help their reputation with the board.
"Lawyers will state brazenly, 'I don't do numbers, I only do words', and in doing so they exclude themselves from the most important decisions their organisations face; not a move that gets you on the board," notes Edward Smith, general counsel of Telefonica, in the report.
The number of British general counsel on boards of directors will likely change in the coming years as corporations evolve and recognise the value of the in-house legal department, and legal leaders continue to want a spot on the board. Little said one thing that comes out of the report is that many lawyers are comfortable being just lawyers.
"Lawyers are comfortable in that legal risk area and may not want to step outside of that," Little said.
Ultimately, if corporate legal leaders want a spot on the board, they will have to go after it.
"General counsel need to drive that speed of change if they want to [have permanent board membership]," Little said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGCs Say They are Getting 'Edged Out' of UK Boardrooms
A&O Shearman Becomes First Long-Term Corporate Partner to UN Refugee Agency
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Many LA County Law Firms Remain Open, Mobilize to Support Affected Employees Amid Historic Firestorm
- 2Stevens & Lee Names New Delaware Shareholder
- 3U.S. Supreme Court Denies Trump Effort to Halt Sentencing
- 4From CLO to President: Kevin Boon Takes the Helm at Mysten Labs
- 5How Law Schools Fared on California's July 2024 Bar Exam
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250