IBA Survey Finds Endemic Sexual Harassment, Bullying Across Global Law
Giant poll of nearly 7,000 people working in law finds issues are rife but hugely under-reported.
May 15, 2019 at 12:01 AM
3 minute read
The International Bar Association (IBA) has found sexual harassment and bullying are rife across the global legal profession, as the organisation ramps up its efforts to draw attention to the issues.
The survey, which had nearly 7,000 responses from across 135 countries, found half of female respondents had been affected by bullying in the workplace while a third of female respondents had been sexually harassed at work.
One in three male respondents had also experienced workplace bullying, while one in 14 had been sexually harassed in a work context.
The majority of those surveyed (73%) worked at law firms, with the remainder spread across barristers' chambers, government and in-house departments, and the judiciary.
The IBA's report on its research, conducted over several months last year, found bullying is "rampant" in the legal profession, with almost half of the survey's respondents saying they have experienced bullying in their career, and that the issue is rarely reported.
Two women working at law firms, whose comments were included in the report, said they felt suicidal as a result of bullying they experienced.
Another reported her experiences working under a bullying manager. She said: "I felt sick every day. He would have fits of rage – screaming at me, violently kicking cabinets while I cowered in the corner… I was frightened of him."
The report also found sexual harassment is "alarmingly" commonplace in the legal profession and has an unequal impact on women. Some 37% of female respondents had experienced sexual harassment during their career compared to 7% of men, the survey found.
One woman who worked at a U.K. law firm described an incident when a client "lunged" at her.
She said: "A client said I must see the view he had from his hotel room and after initially saying no I eventually popped into his room… He then lunged… I felt like an idiot. I was worried it had ruined my career."
The survey found that both bullying and sexual harassment are underreported, with the majority of respondents (57%) never reporting incidents of bullying, compared to 11% reporting "on all occasions".
Survey participants cited profile or status of perpetrator as the main reason for not doing so, followed by "concerns about repercussions".
Meanwhile, the study found that incidents of sexual harassment "are very rarely reported" and that when reports are made, "workplace responses are typically inadequate, with perpetrators infrequently sanctioned".
The report also states: "Sexual harassment is having a considerable negative impact on the legal sector, with many sexually harassed respondents considering leaving their workplaces or the profession altogether."
One woman, who worked at a law firm in the U.K. said she left her workplace after reporting that she had been physically sexually harassed.
She said: "The partners closed ranks around the perpetrator [of seriously inappropriate physical contact]. The firm did nothing to sanction him and later promoted him into a more senior, but marginally less public, position. They offered me no support or reassurances about my career. I felt I had no choice but to leave."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBird & Bird Steers Katjes in Bittersweet Dispute with Lindt & Nestlé Over Vegan Chocolate Patent
Hong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Big Four Japanese Firm Mori Hamada Launches Foreign Joint Law Enterprise, Joins Rebrand Drive
US Wins Trade Dispute with Mexico Over Genetically Modified Corn
Trending Stories
- 1Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 2Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 3Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 4Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 5Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250