EU Fines Five Banks $1.2BN Over Currency Trading Cartel
Citigroup, Barclays, JPMorgan, The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) and MUFG (formerly Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi) were all hit with fines.
May 16, 2019 at 01:14 PM
3 minute read
The European Commission has fined five banks a total €1.07 billion ($1.2 billion) for manipulating the foreign exchange market in 11 currencies.
Citigroup Inc., Barclays, JPMorgan Chase & Co., and the Royal Bank of Scotland were fined €811.197 million ($906.8 million); and Barclays, RBS and MUFG Bank (formerly Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi) were fined €257.682 million ($288 million).
UBS was also included in the commission's decision but wasn't fined, as it had revealed the existence of the cartels to the authorities.
"Today we have fined Barclays, The Royal Bank of Scotland, Citigroup, JPMorgan and MUFG Bank, and these cartel decisions send a clear message that the commission will not tolerate collusive behaviour in any sector of the financial markets," said Margrethe Vestager, the EU's antitrust chief. "The behaviour of these banks undermined the integrity of the sector at the expense of the European economy and consumers."
The commission found that foreign exchange traders at the banks had operated cartels that manipulated the prices of currencies. The traders, who were nominally rivals in the forex market, shared confidential information about their clients' needs and their trading plans in confidential chatrooms.
Traders exchanged information about customers' future orders, the spreads between the prices for buying and selling a currency (known as the bid-ask spread), and their risk positions. The information enabled the traders to make decisions about whether to buy or sell certain currencies and at what price.
The traders gave the chatrooms names that reflected the fact that they knew each other personally. One of the chatrooms was known as "Essex Express 'n the Jimmy", because all the traders except for one named James lived in Essex, an area just outside London, and met on a train into work in the City. Another was called the "Three-Way Banana Split".
The two cartels, known as "Forex – Three-Way Banana Split" and "Forex – Essex Express", ran from December 2007 to January 2014 and from December 2009 to July 2012, respectively.
Several of the banks had their fines reduced because they cooperated with the investigation. UBS escaped fines altogether because it revealed the existence of the cartels to the authorities.
JPMorgan, Citi, Barclays and RBS settled a similar inquiry with the U.S. Department of Justice in 2015. The banks agreed then to pay fines of more than $2.5 billion.
Companies and individuals affected by the cartels have the right to apply for damages in their national courts, the EC said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250