Legaltech's Competitive Edge Top of Mind for UK Law Schools
Universities in England and Wales are steadily coming to the realisation that legal tech knowledge is a necessary skill for any aspiring solicitor in the U.K.
May 16, 2019 at 11:06 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
As technology and client expectations evolve, so too are the skillsets needed by lawyers. It's a common adage repeated by legal educators and legal tech advocates in the U.S., but recently it's also being heard across the Atlantic.
In parts of the U.K., law firm clients are demanding their counsel use technology to address their matters. In turn, a growing number of universities in England and Wales are creating legal technology courses for their students.
Alan East, chair of the England-based Law Society's education and training committee, said he's beginning to see legal technology take hold in U.K. law schools.
He noted that for students who attend prestigious law firms, who are often eyed by Magic Circle firms that invest in and support legaltech, like Allen & Overy, legaltech experience can be a competitive advantage over their peers. On the other hand, for students at less prestigious law schools, a legaltech education can prepare them "for the legal rigors of the future".
A Reed Smith announcement in April regarding a partnership with the University of Exeter Law School for a new four-year LLB programme is an indicator of the growing demand for new approaches to legal education.
Starting in 2020-2021, five University of Exeter Law School students can take part in the LLB programme. While the bulk of the programme will be spent learning core law requirements, such as contract and criminal law, students will also spend one year at Reed Smith. There, students will split their time between two Reed Smith practice groups and work with the firm's attorneys on legal matters and use technology to address clients' needs.
"[They are] looking at legal issues and the technology available to law firms that's changing by the day, and really taking the time to explore what technology will be appropriate for the legal matter they must address," said Reed Smith chief knowledge officer Lucy Dillon.
To be sure, Reed Smith's London office has previously worked with a local law school through its traditional Queen Mary LLB Law in Practice programme, but Dillon noted the new course places an emphasis on innovation and leveraging technology to solve clients' challenges and legal services delivery requests.
"We want to make sure our junior lawyers arrive with an understanding that technology is going to change how they work and not to be frightened about it," Dillon said.
The LLB programme is far from the only legaltech course offered in the U.K. Luke Mason, vice-chair of the Association of Law Teachers, said many law schools are offering small programmes regarding legaltech. But he added that such courses are about "much more of the phenomenon of the technology and not the skill of law tech".
However, Mason noted that Exeter "seems to be the beginning of something new". He added it appears the university is "actually looking at it as a separate skill to be a lawyer of the future". He also noted that BPP University offers a similar approach, while the University of Wales' LLM in legal technology poses an "interesting" and unique law school curriculum.
At the University of Wales, students can learn how to create legal solutions with artificial intelligence, blockchain and other advanced technology, while earning a legal degree.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250