'We Must Collaborate, Not Keep Our Cards Close To Our Chests' – Stephanie Hamon On The Future of Legaltech
Stephanie Hamon is co-chair of this year's Legal Week Strategic Technology Forum, taking place on 19-21 June.
May 20, 2019 at 12:49 AM
6 minute read
Former Barclays managing director, head of external engagement Stephanie Hamon is co-chair of Legal Week's 2019 Strategic Technology Forum, which is taking place next month. Ahead of the event, she discusses AI, collaboration, and what she thinks is the most exciting thing in the legaltech market at the moment.
What, in your eyes, is the most exciting development in the legaltech market at the moment?
Although I might of course be biased, I think what Barclays is doing with its Eagle legal labs is really great. It's bringing a momentum to create a collaborative space, and there's been a lot of interest from the law society and government of Singapore.
Legal Labs is about creating a venue to incubate legal technology companies, in partnership with several law firms and some academic institutions including UCL and the University of Liverpool. So it's about creating an environment for legaltech startups to thrive. In the lab they have access to the Barclays legal function, so can talk to lawyers to see if their solutions have any merits and to hear the voice of their would-be clients.
There's lots of tools out there around legal technology, but what I think is really good is something that allows everyone to speak together, where everyone collaborates.
What is the biggest challenge facing the legal technology market right now?
There's been so many developments with law tech companies claiming they're the only one doing it, so it's hard to know what competition there is out there and what they are up to. It's about knowing the competition and having access to the market.
During your time at Barclays, what was the most innovative use of technology you experienced?
We've been somewhat disappointed by what we've seen so far. There's a lot of talk about AI but a lot of it isn't truly AI.
We've been more excited by innovation and about how people are reinventing the way they deliver their services, and it's been exciting to see how people respond to feedback where we tell them it hasn't gone too well.
So there's been nothing yet that's really made you go 'wow!'?
There have been some that have got me excited, but it did also dependent on what role I was in. A lawyer in private practice would probably be excited about something very different.
Ones which I've been most excited about are ones that do legal spend analytics, whether AI powered or not. These suddenly give you far more information for you to make your decisions in the running of your business.
Are banks ahead of the market in terms of legaltech?
After attending various conferences, I've found that there's innovation in very different areas of the market.
One of the people I would use as an example is Rob Booth [Crown Estate general counsel] – he's not in the banking world and doesn't have the same size budget but what he's done has been very innovative and transformative.
So it's not a question of budget, sector or size but of leadership.
What do you think is the future of legal technology? What's going to be the next big thing?
From a client perspective, what I want is an integrated solution – maybe one tool which integrates all the legaltech companies. That's the direction we should be going in – an integration of all the different ideas into one collaborative platform.
Is there a sort of reluctance from companies to collaborate because they're competing against each other?
I'm not sure, because there is a lot of collaboration already.
We will all benefit more from collaborating instead of keeping our cards close to our chests. We need to look at the bigger picture because everyone's going to struggle, so we need to provide clarity through a collaborative solution.
What are the key themes going to be discussed at the Strategic Technology Forum?
The overall idea behind the event is to broaden the conversation around innovation and to have practical conversations with people who are driving change in the market.
Day one is about legal services delivery: first how you create innovation and new technology, then how to deliver it, then about how you form a relationship with the client and understand what it is they want.
Day two is focused on individuals and how to equip people to help them grasp what innovation is really about and for them to foster the right mindset for it. Then we'll be talking about the positive impacts of diversity – discussing topics such as the unconscious bias. It'll be about how to develop the right culture in your company to create that innovation mindset.
Day three is about the tools that can drive change and innovation. The first tool explored will be the psychology behind driving change, and the second is the data. We'll finish by discussing something that is not itself a tool but is related – the cybersecurity risks that arise with technological changes.
Why are these topics so important for the current legal market?
Change is finally happening and there's a lot of good initiatives out there. So now we need to bring everyone together to agree on what the most important topics should be.
It's hard to see the wood from the trees at the moment – sometimes it's hard to tell if something is a genuinely good idea or just has good marketing.
The market is fragmented at the moment – so it's now about not reinventing the wheel but instead creating a collaboration forum so that the whole legal ecosystem can benefit.
- The Strategic Technology Forum Europe will take place at La Quinta Golf Resort & Spa, Marbella, Spain on June 19-21, 2019. For more information see here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe British Legal Awards 2024: Who Won What and Why—Transactional Awards
Kenya to Host Inaugural African Legal Technology & Innovation Awards in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 2Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 3Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 4Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
- 5Burr & Forman, Smith Gambrell & Russell Promote More to Partner This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250