Huawei's Chief Legal Officer Takes Center Stage in Conflict With US
The Chinese tech giant's CLO, Song Liuping, held a press conference Wednesday and criticized U.S. restrictions as "not normal" and an unconstitutional "trial by legislature."
May 29, 2019 at 01:53 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd chief legal officer Song Liuping ratcheted up the Chinese tech giant's public relations offensive on Wednesday, when he denounced the U.S. government's actions against his company as "not normal" and "trial by legislature".
Liuping also announced during a press conference in Shenzhen, China, that Huawei had just filed a motion for summary judgment in the Eastern District of Texas. The company is asking a federal judge to declare as unconstitutional the Trump administration's use of a provision in the National Defense Authorization Act to ban Huawei's equipment.
"This legislation provides Huawei with no opportunity to defend ourselves or provide evidence… This is 'trial by legislature', and it is prohibited by the U.S. Constitution," Liuping said. He later said Huawei does not pose a security threat and "U.S. politicians are using cybersecurity as an excuse to gain public support for actions that are designed to achieve other goals".
Adams Lee, an international trade lawyer at Harris Bricken in Seattle who represents U.S. and Chinese companies, expressed some scepticism about the merits of Huawei's constitutional argument, at least at this stage in the lawsuit, which was filed in March.
"Speaking as a general observer, anytime anyone raises a U.S. constitutional argument, that's usually kind of a Hail Mary-type of argument," he said. "If you're using the kitchen sink approach, that's something you throw in to flavour the rest of the arguments you're using. If you're leading with that, it doesn't sound like it's a terribly strong argument."
However, Lee added that people have always complained about the Chinese government's top-down approach, where it is difficult to decipher how decisions are made or who comes up with them. "The U.S. is starting to become more like China in that way," he said.
During the press conference, Liuping also spoke out against the U.S. Commerce Department's May 16 decision to add Huawei and nearly 70 of its affiliates in 26 countries to a trade blacklist. Liuping said the move could harm more than three billion Huawei customers in 170 countries, including 1,200 U.S. companies and residents in rural areas that lack access to affordable broadband networks.
"This will affect tens of thousands of American jobs," he said. "We believe this sets a dangerous precedent. Today it's telecoms and Huawei. Tomorrow it could be your industry, your company."
Read More:
Compliance Concerns Spike Over Huawei Trade Restrictions
Huawei Taps Jones Day, Morgan Lewis in Challenge to US Defense Law
US Businesses With Ties to Huawei Need to Prepare for Disruption
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpanish Firm Continues Geographical Diversification With Latest Partner Appointments
MoFo Replenishes Singapore Corporate Partner Loss as Lawyer Returns From Gibson Dunn
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250