Updated: After US Verdicts, Australian Firm Files Lawsuit Against Roundup Manufacturer
The state government of Victoria is also launching an investigation into the use of RoundUp's active ingredient—glyphosate. The moves follow a $2 billion punitive damages verdict in California in May against Roundup manufacturer Monsanto.
June 03, 2019 at 01:18 PM
3 minute read
In light of three consecutive verdicts totaling $2.2 billion in the U.S linking the weedkiller Roundup to cancer, the Australian firm Carbone Lawyers has filed a lawsuit against Roundup manufacturer Monsanto Co., while the Victoria State Government is launching an investigation into the use of glyphosate, the most commonly used herbicide globally and the main ingredient in Roundup.*
Melbourne-based Carbone Lawyers filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of Victoria against Monsanto on June 3 on behalf of self-employed gardener Michael Ogalirolo, 54, who is seeking damages against the company for his long-term use of Roundup. Ogalirolo claims the glyphosate-based weedkiller caused his blood cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, which was diagnosed in 2011 and forced him to retire in 2015.*
Two other Australian firms are considering filing lawsuits against Monsanto. Sydney-based LHD Lawyers is considering a class action against Monsanto, which German pharmaceutical giant Bayer A.G. acquired in June last year for $63 billion, while local media reports say Melbourne-based Maurice Blackburn is evaluating individual cases.
Meanwhile, the Australian State of Victoria is investigating the use of glyphosate, including by Roundup, across its public land management, according to Melbourne-based newspaper The Age. The investigation, which is being conducted by Victoria's Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, is expected to last six weeks. It is the first by an Australian state government in the wake of a series of verdicts in U.S. courts, according to the newspaper.
The developments come about three weeks after Monsanto was hit with a $2.05 billion punitive damages verdict by a jury in Alameda County Superior Court in Oakland, California – the largest U.S. jury verdict so far against the company over glyphosate's link to the same kind of blood cancer with the plaintiff in Australia. Previously, Monsanto was hit initially with a $289 million verdict in August, though that was reduced to $78.5 million; and $80 million in March, both in San Francisco.*
Bayer said it will appeal the $2.05 billion verdict.
Globally, a number of countries and jurisdictions have either banned the use of glyphosate or have restricted its use. These include Belgium, France, Italy, Canada, Argentina, Colombia, the Czech Republic and Denmark.
*Updated June 5: This article has been updated with Carbone Lawyers filing a lawsuit against Monsanto. The headline, first, second and fifth paragraphs have been changed to reflect that.
|Related Stories:
Monsanto Hit With $2BN in Punitives in Oakland Roundup Trial
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250