US Firm Acts on Caster Semenya Athletics Appeal
The International Association of Athletics Federations had introduced a new testosterone limit for female athletes who want to compete in middle distance events.
June 04, 2019 at 04:18 AM
3 minute read
Sidley Austin is acting for Olympic gold medallist Caster Semenya as she appeals a decision to require her to limit her testosterone levels.
The South African middle-distance runner has appealed to the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, challenging the recent ruling against her by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).
On May 1, CAS ruled in favour of world athletics governing body the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), which had enforced a testosterone limit for individuals with disorders of sex development (DSD).
Semenya is appealing the decision on human rights grounds.
Filing her appeal, Semenya said: "I am a woman and I am a world-class athlete. The IAAF will not drug me or stop me from being who I am."
Representing Caster Semenya in the Swiss Federal Supreme Court are Sidley arbitration partners Dorothee Schramm and David Roney, both based in the firm's Geneva office.
According to Sidley's statement, Semenya's lawyers will ask the Court to consider whether the IAAF's requirements for compulsory drug interventions "violate essential and widely recognised public policy values, including the prohibition against discrimination, the right to physical integrity, the right to economic freedom, and respect for human dignity".
Meanwhile, Bird & Bird has advised the IAAF throughout the CAS process, led by the firm's sports group co-head Jonathan Taylor QC. The firm is assisting lead counsel Ross Wenzel of Swiss firm Kellerhals Carrard throughout the appeals process.
During the CAS proceedings, Semenya turned to dispute resolution partner Jim Bunting of Canada-headquartered firm Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg, and Norton Rose Fulbright's Africa team head, Greg Nott.
Nott said in a statement: "It is gravely concerning that the IAAF has called on doctors to 'clarify' the gender identities of female athletes and justified medical interventions on female athletes as 'gender-affirming'.
"Such views are based not in modern science or medicine. Instead, they reflect an outdated and deeply flawed sociocultural stereotype of what it means to be a woman."
While the appeal is pending, the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland has ordered the IAAF to suspend the implementation of the eligibility regulations against Caster Semenya, according to Sidley's statement, allowing her to compete without restriction in the female category.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCarey Abogados’ Senior Partner Becomes New Head of IBA, First Chilean to Assume Role of President
Goodwin Hires Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner to Launch Brussels Office
3 minute readClaus von Wobeser: Mexico's ‘Godfather of Arbitration’ Becomes Firm’s Honorary Chair
Jenner & Block Expands London Team with Baker McKenzie Hire to Lead New Practice Area
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250