Client Data Dispute Erupts Between Ince and Former France Offices
The two separate factions of legacy Ince & Co have been at odds since the Gordon Dadds takeover.
June 05, 2019 at 10:45 AM
3 minute read
Ince Gordon Dadds, now known as 'Ince'
The acrimony between Ince and its former France branch has intensified, with the two parties currently embroiled in a dispute over access to client data.
In the latest episode in the ongoing feud between the two former affiliates, a partner in the Paris office of Ince & Co France has questioned the manner in which Ince Gordon Dadds – which last week rebranded to 'Ince' – manages a database that holds sensitive data pertaining to clients of both the London-headquartered firm and the now-independent Ince & Co France.
Though there is no suggestion Ince has misused any of the disputed data managed on its database, Ince & Co France partner Laurence Hanley contends that the data in dispute belongs to the entities that went into administration at the beginning of the year. This included Ince & Co International, of which several equity partners in France are a part.
"It is not clear to us by what right they have access to data belonging to Ince & Co in administration," Ince & Co France partner Laurence Hanley told Legal Week.
He added: "We don't know how they can justify that. They're a different law firm. When we open a new client case, they send a notification to their whole firm. They still have access."
An insider at Ince & Co France said the branch had about 5,000 to 6,000 open matters, and that since the parting of ways, the Paris-headquartered firm has been in the process of developing its own client database at a cost.
Hanley also said: "We have been asking [Ince London] for months to transfer our data to us, but they have always found a reason not to or to delay."
However, Ince London has hit back.
Responding to all of Ince & Co France's allegations, a spokesperson for the Aldgate-based firm said in a statement to Legal Week: "Ince [London] denies any allegations of client data being handled improperly. Protecting our clients' data is paramount to our business and we handle their data in accordance with the applicable regulations and data management best practice."
Further, a person with knowledge of the matter said that, following the administration, the London office acquired responsibility to continue providing certain services – including data hosting – to the firm's network entities, including Ince France.
Earlier this year, Ince & Co France confirmed it was not going to join the newly combined Ince, which has since absorbed the rest of Ince & Co's international network.
In the ensuing months, the two parties have been at odds over, among other things, capital entitlements, with people close to the matter saying Ince offered to pay capital back to partners in France only if they joined the firm, which they refused to do.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Partners from Baker McKenzie, DLA Piper and PwC Join New Firms in Australia Partners from Baker McKenzie, DLA Piper and PwC Join New Firms in Australia](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/394/2024/10/Talent-Attraction-767x633.jpg)
Partners from Baker McKenzie, DLA Piper and PwC Join New Firms in Australia
4 minute read![India Firm Engaged as Volkswagen Sues Local Authorities Over $1.4B Tax Bill India Firm Engaged as Volkswagen Sues Local Authorities Over $1.4B Tax Bill](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/401/2022/06/VW-Cypress.jpg)
India Firm Engaged as Volkswagen Sues Local Authorities Over $1.4B Tax Bill
![De Brauw Partner Departs for In-House Role with Swiss Family Enterprise De Brauw Partner Departs for In-House Role with Swiss Family Enterprise](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/9e/5e/11bbd7bf41a0a31b0d0609e2c76f/sven-dumoulin-new-chief-legal-officer-cofra-holding-767x633.jpg)
De Brauw Partner Departs for In-House Role with Swiss Family Enterprise
![Reed Smith Joins Saudi Legal Boom as UK and US Firms Race for Market Share Reed Smith Joins Saudi Legal Boom as UK and US Firms Race for Market Share](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2023/03/AdobeStock_391708693-767x633.jpg)
Reed Smith Joins Saudi Legal Boom as UK and US Firms Race for Market Share
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Carol-Lisa Phillips to Rise to Broward Chief Judge as Jack Tuter Weighs Next Move
- 2Data Breaches in UK Legal Sector Surge, According to ICO Data
- 3Georgia Law Schools Seeing 24% More Applicants This Year
- 4After Shutting USAID, Trump Eyes Department of Education, CFPB
- 5‘Keep Men Out’: Female Swimmers Sue Ivy Leagues Over Lia Thomas’ Sweep
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250