One in Three General Counsel Plotting Enhanced Diversity Targets For Advisers
A survey has revealed the increased importance general counsel are placing on diversity in law firms and how many are willing turn away those who fall short.
June 17, 2019 at 04:45 AM
3 minute read
One in three general counsel are planning to introduce new or enhanced diversity requirements for their external legal advisers, a survey of top in-house lawyers has found.
The poll of 86 U.K. senior in-house counsel conducted by Legal Week in conjunction with New Law service Lexoo found 34% are looking to introduce targets, while 30% said they have changed or turned down external counsel for not presenting a diverse enough team.
Although still a minority, the numbers demonstrate the increased importance general counsel are placing on diversity within their external advisers, and how they are willing to enforce it by turning away law firms that fall short.
One in five survey respondents said they already require all of their external counsel to meet specific requirements for diversity, while a further 22% said they put targets in place sometimes or for some advisers.
The area of diversity that requires the most improvement, according almost half of the in-house lawyers, is the range of socioeconomic backgrounds on show in law firms.
The second most chosen option was black and minority ethnic backgrounds at 24%, then women at 17%, 4% answered LGBTQ+, and finally 3% answered neuro-diverse people.
Asked about diversity within the industry, one general counsel commented on email: "Our panel model requires all of our firms to report on their extant inclusion initiatives, internal diversity metrics and internal diversity trends on an annual basis.
"That is in addition to our requiring that information for tendering. Our firms are then benchmarked against each other, our own organisation and our broader view of industry maturity; and scored. The scores allocated through our assessment go straight to reward and retention of panel position."
In March, 65 U.K. general counsel wrote an open letter calling for law firms to work harder on achieving greater diversity.
One part of the letter read: "We undertake to practise and advance diversity and inclusion by… considering diversity in our hiring and purchasing practices."
The letter followed an open letter by 170 U.S. general counsel in January calling for law firms to improve their diversity.
The letter read: "We, as a group, will direct our substantial outside counsel spend to those law firms that manifest results with respect to diversity and inclusion, in addition to providing the highest degree of quality representation. We sincerely hope that you and your firm will be among those that demonstrate this commitment."
Speaking to Legal Week last year, Coca-Cola general counsel and company secretary Clare Wardle said: "[We need to] expect diversity in our wider virtual team of external lawyers and consultants from the outset, including it as a criterion in our panel review and following up by making it clear we expect strong, diverse teams."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBird & Bird Steers Katjes in Bittersweet Dispute with Lindt & Nestlé Over Vegan Chocolate Patent
Hong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Big Four Japanese Firm Mori Hamada Launches Foreign Joint Law Enterprise, Joins Rebrand Drive
US Wins Trade Dispute with Mexico Over Genetically Modified Corn
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250