One in Three General Counsel Plotting Enhanced Diversity Targets For Advisers
A survey has revealed the increased importance general counsel are placing on diversity in law firms and how many are willing turn away those who fall short.
June 17, 2019 at 04:45 AM
3 minute read
One in three general counsel are planning to introduce new or enhanced diversity requirements for their external legal advisers, a survey of top in-house lawyers has found.
The poll of 86 U.K. senior in-house counsel conducted by Legal Week in conjunction with New Law service Lexoo found 34% are looking to introduce targets, while 30% said they have changed or turned down external counsel for not presenting a diverse enough team.
Although still a minority, the numbers demonstrate the increased importance general counsel are placing on diversity within their external advisers, and how they are willing to enforce it by turning away law firms that fall short.
One in five survey respondents said they already require all of their external counsel to meet specific requirements for diversity, while a further 22% said they put targets in place sometimes or for some advisers.
The area of diversity that requires the most improvement, according almost half of the in-house lawyers, is the range of socioeconomic backgrounds on show in law firms.
The second most chosen option was black and minority ethnic backgrounds at 24%, then women at 17%, 4% answered LGBTQ+, and finally 3% answered neuro-diverse people.
Asked about diversity within the industry, one general counsel commented on email: "Our panel model requires all of our firms to report on their extant inclusion initiatives, internal diversity metrics and internal diversity trends on an annual basis.
"That is in addition to our requiring that information for tendering. Our firms are then benchmarked against each other, our own organisation and our broader view of industry maturity; and scored. The scores allocated through our assessment go straight to reward and retention of panel position."
In March, 65 U.K. general counsel wrote an open letter calling for law firms to work harder on achieving greater diversity.
One part of the letter read: "We undertake to practise and advance diversity and inclusion by… considering diversity in our hiring and purchasing practices."
The letter followed an open letter by 170 U.S. general counsel in January calling for law firms to improve their diversity.
The letter read: "We, as a group, will direct our substantial outside counsel spend to those law firms that manifest results with respect to diversity and inclusion, in addition to providing the highest degree of quality representation. We sincerely hope that you and your firm will be among those that demonstrate this commitment."
Speaking to Legal Week last year, Coca-Cola general counsel and company secretary Clare Wardle said: "[We need to] expect diversity in our wider virtual team of external lawyers and consultants from the outset, including it as a criterion in our panel review and following up by making it clear we expect strong, diverse teams."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrio of Firms Act On Chinese Insurer Ping An's $1.7B Stake Acquisition In Healthcare Arm
King & Spalding’s Merger Marks Key Move in Saudi Arabia’s Legal Surge
3 minute readRBG Holdings Suspends Trading After Weeks of Internal Strife and Financial Struggles
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250