Freshfields' Ryan Beckwith to Face Full SDT Hearing
Beckwith stands accused of abusing his position of seniority and engaging in sexual activity with a junior colleague without her consent.
June 19, 2019 at 10:11 AM
3 minute read
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer partner Ryan Beckwith will face a full Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) hearing later this year, over alleged sexual misconduct.
In April, Beckwith faced an SDT panel, standing accused of having engaged in sexual activity with a junior colleague without her consent.
The case is set to proceed to a substantive hearing, scheduled to take place over 10 days in October.
Today (June 19) concluded a case management hearing against Beckwith, during which his legal team attempted to have the case thrown out.
Beckwith's defence, led by Adrian Williamson QC, attempted to have the case dismissed on two counts. The first on abuse of process: the defence accused the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) of contaminating evidence, claiming that the authority had shown Beckwith's statement to the complainant 'Person A'.
The second application was that the conduct in question relating to the two key allegations – that Beckwith had kissed Person A, and that he had abused his position of seniority to engage in sexual activity with Person A – was a private matter outside of the SDT's jurisdiction.
The SDT dismissed both applications, saying there was still a case to answer.
The panel then heard arguments regarding disclosure.
Reiterating the defence's position, Williamson said that by failing to request Person A's medical and therapy records, there had been an "abuse of process". He argued: "If Person A refuses to comply [with disclosure], there will be an abuse of process."
However, the SDT panel said: "It is not appropriate for us to give a direction for the SRA to investigate."
Meanwhile, the SRA, represented by Riel Karmy-Jones QC, argued: "We reject the suggestion that these matters have not been dealt with."
However, Williamson said that, although there were "significant and fundamental disclosure difficulties", he was certain that "they will resolve" and made no application as to disclosure.
"There is no need for further consideration," he said.
Witness statements are to be filed tomorrow (June 20).
Freshfields senior partner Edward Braham said in a statement: "We note the decision of the tribunal and confirm [Beckwith] remains on indefinite leave."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPogust Goodhead Set to Axe Roles as Accounts Remain Overdue
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250