UK Top 50 Halts Slide in Profit Margin
Technology is cited as a possible driver behind efficiency gains as an analysis of LLP accounts reveals the hidden strengths and weaknesses at the largest firms.
June 19, 2019 at 04:40 AM
4 minute read
The U.K.'s top law firms have improved their profit margin for the first time in years, as they continue to seek out efficiency gains amid a continued rise in staff costs.
An in-depth analysis of limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts for the 2017-18 financial year, carried out in conjunction with professional services firm Smith & Williamson, found the profit margin for the combined U.K. top 50 inched up 0.4% to reach 31%.
Although small, the overall increase is significant for the top firms, given the number had fallen every year since 2014-15.
Half of the top 50 improved their operating profit margin, compared with 14 where it declined. In the previous financial year, 16 firms had seen an improvement and 22 had seen a decline.
The biggest improvements were seen at Hill Dickinson (7%) and CMS (5%), while Clifford Chance, Ashurst, Shoosmiths and TLT all saw a 3% rise.
The firms with the highest profit margins were Fieldfisher (48%), Travers Smith (46%) and Osborne Clarke (44%). Those with the lowest were BLM (14%), Gateley (17%) and Withers (18%).
The combined profit margin rise came despite a 7% jump in staff costs. The costs rise, which continues a theme of recent years, reflected salary increases but was also due to the number of lawyers and support staff at firms increasing by an average of 4% after a fall the previous year.
The staff costs rise affected four out of five of the firms, and a third experienced hikes of 10% or more.
But strong revenue growth of 8% meant staff costs as a percentage of revenue remained flat and operating profit grew 8.1%. In the previous financial year, revenue had grown 2.2% and profits by 6.8%.
Firms got more out of their lawyers, especially at larger firms. On average, the firms managed a 5% improvement in turnover per fee earner. Only eight firms saw a decrease in this area and none of them was in the top 20.
Investment in technology is also likely to be a driver behind the efficiency improvement, according to Giles Murphy, head of professional practices at Smith & Williamson. "Maybe we are seeing the first signs of technology starting to have a significant impact on the efficiency of service delivery," he said. "However, the size of the impact that technology has had to date on the legal sector is relatively limited compared with other industries. So while there are some positive signs, there is much still to be done."
Despite the strong trading performance, law firms continue to operate with relatively low cash balances, the analysis found. Total cash and cash equivalents held by the top 50 rose 1% to £1.325 billion, while loans and overdrafts rose 7% to £875 million.
Taking the debt off the cash balance leaves the top 50 with £450 million, which is well below their combined monthly wage bill of £610 million.
All the Magic Circle firms – which the exception of Slaughter and May, which does not provide accounts because it is not an LLP – showed they have no debt. Those with the largest debt positions were Herbert Smith Freehills, which had £176.8 million of debt versus £42.5 million of cash; Clyde & Co, which had £107 million of debt against £37.2 million of cash; and Norton Rose Fulbright, which had £58.8 million of debt and £10.5 million of cash.
Download the full table here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Thrive in Central and Eastern Europe, Law Firms Need to 'Know the Rules of the Game'
7 minute readGOP's Washington Trifecta Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250