KPMG France Appoints Heavyweight Legal Adviser On Fidal Dispute
Both sides have appointed top-tier advisers to contest a dispute about the Big Four firm's hire of 144 lawyers.
June 21, 2019 at 04:27 AM
3 minute read
The French legal arm of KPMG has appointed top-tier external advisers on its dispute with local firm Fidal about a mass lawyer hire.
The Big Four accountancy firm has instructed highly rated local law firm Veil Jourde to help it defend action taken by Fidal in relation to KPMG's hire of 144 Fidal lawyers – including 26 partners – earlier this year, according to one person close to the process.
KPMG and Veil Jourde declined to comment.
On the other side, Fidal is being advised by Darrois Villey Maillot Brochier, a top-tier French firm that focuses on corporate transactions and dispute resolution.
The fact both are represented by well-regarded firms demonstrates the seriousness with which each side is taking the dispute, which initially erupted on the basis of Fidal's claim that KPMG breached a break-clause when the two firms ended their non-exclusive partnership, which began in 2011 and ended in July 2018.
During discussions prior to ending the partnership, Fidal said two reassurance clauses had been agreed by KPMG: one being the notice that the agreement was ending, and the other a non-poaching clause until 2020, which stated that KPMG could not hire lawyers from Fidal without Fidal's written consent.
However, there is disagreement about how those discussions concluded.
At the time of the hires, KPMG said in statement: "The constructive proposals, made to Fidal to ensure the future of their teams, dedicated to the KPMG network, were rejected by the representatives of Fidal. In this context, a number of professionals have decided to leave Fidal and have expressed their wish to join 'KPMG Avocats'."
This is denied by Fidal.
Fidal is asking for compensation for the damages suffered, which the firm said include a damaged image, loss of turnover, disrespect towards a contract and unfair competition, among others.
The dispute is still in the preliminary stages: Fidal is in the process of finalising all the proceedings against KPMG, having now carried out a damage assessment. A hearing date has not yet been confirmed.
Speaking in French, Fidal managing partner Yves de Sevin said: "[I still have] the same feeling: we respect KPMG's strategy but its form, which disrespects the agreements, is unacceptable and as such, we will defend the interests of the law firm with the greatest determination."
He added that the next step for the dispute is to hear KPMG's response to Fidal's legal action.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250