Hogan Lovells Bags £3M Government Brexit Contract
The firm will guide the government department through the Brexit process during the one year contract.
July 08, 2019 at 05:04 AM
3 minute read
Hogan Lovells has been awarded a £3 million government contract to provide legal services to HM Treasury during and after the Brexit process.
The contract was awarded by The Crown Commercial Services, on behalf of the Treasury, placing Hogan Lovells as legal adviser for a term of one year.
As well as giving business-as-usual legal advice, Hogan Lovells will guide the Treasury as the U.K. exits the European Union, and support it during a time of increased Brexit-related workload.
The contract states the work will include advising the Treasury on "amending and updating instruments made under the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 – in order to implement the U.K.'s exit from the EU", and that Hogan Lovells will be "heavily involved in the next stage of negotiations establishing the U.K.'s new relationship with the EU."
It adds that the firm will help the establishment of a customs regime, and will assist as the U.K. "seeks to establish global financial partnerships supported by free trade agreements and bilateral arrangements with key jurisdictions across the rest of the world".
Hogan Lovells will work as part of a wider team of lawyers, policy experts and officials within the Treasury, across the government and with stakeholders in U.K. regulators, including the Financial Conduct Authority and the Bank of England.
The contract will run from May 7, 2019 to May 6, 2020, with the option of extending the contract twice for an additional year, up until May 6, 2022.
As part of the contract, Hogan Lovells will meet with the Treasury once a month and will supply one secondee at any one time to work in-house.
A Hogan Lovells spokesperson confirmed the appointment but declined to comment further.
A slew of government contracts have been handed out to law firms recently.
Earlier this year, Clifford Chance won two government mandates. First, it won a spot on the Financial Services Compensation Scheme's legal panel in January – with Eversheds Sutherland and Addleshaw Goddard also winning spots. The following month, CC was awarded a contract by Treasury sub-group the Debt Management Office.
In the same month, Slaughter and May was awarded an £800,000 government contract for the Department of Transport.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
FCA Fines Metro Bank £16.7M Over ‘Financial Crime Failings’
Trending Stories
- 1NY District Attorneys Ask for Level Funding Amid Statewide Drop in Violent Crime
- 2Texas Trial Boutique Matches Milbank Bonuses, Paying up to $140K
- 3'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
- 4On the Employment Front, What Changes Are Likely Under Trump?
- 5By the Numbers: The 2024 LTN Law Firm Tech Survey
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
