UK Firm Plans Further Growth in Australia
Clyde & Co Australia managing partner Michael Tooma said the firm will expand its head count in Australia with more lateral hires and take advantage of an upswing in litigation to increase its revenue.
July 08, 2019 at 01:59 PM
5 minute read
Sydney, Australia. Photo: Taras Vyshnya/Shutterstock.com
U.K. law firm Clyde & Co plans to continue its aggressive growth strategy in Australia, on the back of an upswing in litigation and by poaching partners from other firms.
The firm's Australian arm has experienced double-digit growth in revenue since it was established in 2012, with an increase of 33% in the last fiscal year and 28% the previous year.
"We are aggressively pursuing growth in each of the industries that we are focusing on," said Michael Tooma, managing partner of Clyde & Co Australia. "And we are doing that organically in terms of promotions from existing talent within Australia and we are doing it by actively being in the market for lateral partners in those industries."
Globally, Clyde & Co's revenue increased by more than 11%, to £611 million ($775 million) during the past year, according to Legal Week.
In Australia, the firm specialises in infrastructure and construction, transport, energy, insurance and cybersecurity. While it does have some transaction capability, it is mostly focused on pursuing litigation opportunities, be they funded by litigation funders, by corporations or by insurance policies, Tooma said, adding that the firm has benefited from a "very significant spike in litigation".
"The environment in that space has been quite favourable to law firms generally," he said.
Some of the spike has been driven by findings from various Royal Commissions – government inquiries into the banking and financial system, the aged-care sector and the disability services sector, Tooma said.
![Michael Tooma](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2019/07/Michael-Tooma-Vert-201907081955-199x300.jpg)
"What we're seeing is a rise in class action litigation. Australia was initially late to the party and has really taken to that as a platform and an area where our courts are highly organised," he said. "Even the thresholds are defined in a favourable way to allow for class actions to occur."
Tooma noted that Australia has been one of the "prime movers" behind litigation funding.
Additionally, a significant increase in regulation of occupational health and safety, the environment, cybersecurity and privacy breaches and corporate governance, and a focus on the personal accountability of directors and officers, have led to an increase in litigation in the regulatory space.
"I don't see many of those trends with litigation-based firms diminishing over the next few years – quite the contrary," Tooma said. "There certainly seems to have been a slowing down in some of the transactional areas but litigation as a component of law practice has been on the rise for some time and will continue to be on the rise."
Clyde & Co, which ranked as the 65th highest-grossing law firm in the world on ALM's 2018 Global 200 survey, became the latest in a stream of U.K. firms to target the Australia market when in 2012 it launched in Sydney and Perth with the hire of a four-person insurance team from local firm and Linklater-aligned Allens. It launched its Australian construction practice in 2013 by hiring partners from King & Wood Mallesons and Norton Rose Fulbright, and plans more hires.
"We are looking to make an announcement shortly in relation to another lateral in that space and a team of lawyers," he said. "There is a significant growth focus on that team."
In 2014, the firm opened what was its 40th office worldwide, in Brisbane, with the hire of a three-partner team from local firm Sparke Helmore. It also brought onboard a 30-strong team, including five partners, from Sydney insurance boutique Lee & Lyons in February 2016. Soon after, Tooma joined the firm from Norton Rose Fulbright.
Tooma described Australia as having a very sophisticated market for legal services and said most corporations the firm represents have a very significant in-house legal services capability. "They're very discerning in terms of their use of lawyers and law firms. Long gone are the days where corporates have an exclusive relationship with one particular firm, which they use across the board," he said.
Clyde & Co focuses on the areas in which it is known to be strong and leveraging both its local and global bench strength in those areas. "While that means we don't offer a number of areas of service, clients are generally well serviced by other firms in those spaces," Tooma said. "We are quite content with our clients using a number of firms."
The firm works as a single global entity, with partners based in one jurisdiction potentially working on matters and pitching for clients in other jurisdictions, which Tooma said provides clients with global expertise.
"There won't be any aspect of the areas that we specialise in that we haven't seen in some jurisdiction," he added.
In fact, Tooma said a lot of the firm's Australia-based lawyers end up working on matters outside of Australia because their expertise can "marry up" with the opportunity in that jurisdiction.
"We know who we are, we know what we want to be great at and what we are great at," Tooma said. "We go to market offering those services, we are focused on a certain profile of clients, global in nature, and we're trying to leverage our global expertise."
Related Reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![X Ordered to Release Data by German Court Amid Election Interference Concerns X Ordered to Release Data by German Court Amid Election Interference Concerns](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2023/10/AdobeStock_627004176_Editorial_Use_Only-767x633.jpg)
X Ordered to Release Data by German Court Amid Election Interference Concerns
![Quinn Emanuel's Hamburg Managing Partner and Four-Lawyer Team Jump to Willkie Farr Quinn Emanuel's Hamburg Managing Partner and Four-Lawyer Team Jump to Willkie Farr](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/fa/c2/5b8749a84b7eb919caed3ca3d306/quinn-emanuel-urquhart-sullivan-office-sign-washington-13-767x633.jpg)
Quinn Emanuel's Hamburg Managing Partner and Four-Lawyer Team Jump to Willkie Farr
![Trump ICC Sanctions Condemned as ‘Brazen Attack’ on International Law Trump ICC Sanctions Condemned as ‘Brazen Attack’ on International Law](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2023/11/Trump-Donald-White-House-2019-029-767x633-1.jpg)
Trump ICC Sanctions Condemned as ‘Brazen Attack’ on International Law
![U.S.- China Trade War: Lawyers Label WTO Dispute Pointless, Clients Have Their Hands Tied U.S.- China Trade War: Lawyers Label WTO Dispute Pointless, Clients Have Their Hands Tied](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/ea/56/920bdb1d42d59b3af46660326473/us-china-flags-767x633.jpg)
U.S.- China Trade War: Lawyers Label WTO Dispute Pointless, Clients Have Their Hands Tied
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250