'There Are Huge Gulfs in Quality Between Firms': A Q&A With the Telefonica UK GC
Edward Smith, head of legal and compliance for the mobile network operator O2, talks about being in competition with law firms and slamming his colleague's head in a taxi door.
July 09, 2019 at 06:45 AM
5 minute read
Edward Smith is the general counsel of Telefonica UK, having spent more than 18 years in various roles at the company.
He is responsible for legal, regulatory, business assurance and compliance for the mobile network operator O2, which has 32 million connections in the UK and provides the network infrastructure for mobile virtual network operators such as giffgaff, Sky Mobile, Lyca Mobile and Tesco Mobile.
Telefonica UK has 6,700 employees and 450 retail stores, and sponsors England Rugby, The O2 and many O2 Academy music venues across the UK.
Here, Smith talks to Legal Week about his highlights in the job, favoured law firms, advice to young lawyers starting out, and his take on the value of quality over a good price.
Why did you become a lawyer?
A bloke in a pub (he was a history undergraduate and so was I) explained to me it was possible to qualify as a solicitor, so I thought I would give it a whirl.
What's your proudest professional moment?
I was part of a small team that did O2's exclusive iPhone deal with Apple in 2007.
What's the worst thing that's happened to you while in the job?
I once, inadvertently but repeatedly, slammed a colleague's head in a taxi door. I was tired as I had been up for 72 hours completing an M&A deal in 1999.
What the most common mistake that external counsel make when dealing with you?
Not understanding that they are in competition with other firms and our in-house team. They need to be better, cheaper, or both.
In your experience, how much difference is there in quality between different law firms?
There are huge gulfs in quality between firms, and also within firms. Once we find a good gang of lawyers, we are pretty loyal customers.
Which are your favoured law firms?
The firms we have used the most in the past two years are DWF, Herbert Smith Freehills, Simmons & Simmons, Mischon de Reya and Shoosmiths.
How does working in-house compare with private practice?
In-house lawyers should be solving problems and exploiting opportunities as equal partners with colleagues from elsewhere in their organisations, and they should do this as efficiently as possible.
In private practice, lawyers should aspire to do the same, but they are not equal partners and they have to sell hours to pay their bills, so doing things efficiently sometimes creates a dilemma.
Would you rather: pay less and get adequate advice or pay more and get excellent advice?
It's my job to procure the best advice possible, and to pay as little for it as possible; in that order.
What advice would you give to young lawyers starting out?
Learn how to keep a to-do list better than anyone else you meet.
What are the best and worst things about your job?
The GC role at Telefonica UK (which operates the O2 and giffgaff mobile brands) is a board-level role, and as such I don't operate as a lawyer in the way I used to. The best thing about my job is the level of real influence and responsibility I have and the opportunity this gives me to talk to people on a miscellany of subjects and to represent the company; whether on stage at conferences, during store visits, in meetings colleagues, or with suppliers, customers, government, regulators etc.
The worst thing would be the number of faces and names I am expected to remember; not my strong point.
What do you hope to do when you retire?
Wear shorts all day, have a drink in the afternoon, and nail lots of guitar riffs.
What is the daftest bit of corporate jargon you've heard?
I am immune to it all now, but I always liked "shrinkage" meaning "theft".
What's the most outdated thing you've experienced in the industry?
Tech company executives using pen and paper and printing things out.
…and the most innovative?
The iPhone.
Describe your commute in 10 words or less.
Waze. Podcasts. Spotify. M3 (road not car). Singing.
How many unread emails do you have in your inbox?
Since I started writing this, nine.
Favourite pastime?
Falling about laughing with my family.
What would your motto be?
It's stolen from Danny Baker and Danny Kelly, but it's this: "Sometimes right. Sometimes wrong. Always certain."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInside Travers Smith's AI Training, Development Efforts
From Olympic Aspirations to Legal Innovation: Tom Dunlop's Journey to Founding Summize
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250