Airbnb Bows to EU Demands, Changes Way It Displays Fees
The changes mean the San Franciso-based company is now in compliance with EU consumer protection law and will not have to pay millions of euros in fines.
July 11, 2019 at 06:30 PM
2 minute read
Airbnb has changed the way it displays offers and prices on its online platform – a move that brings it into compliance with EU consumer protection law and enables the company to avoid paying multimillion-euro fines.
The European Commssion on Thursday announced that the San Francisco-based company had passed a year-long probe by its consumer watchdog, the Consumer Protection Cooperation Network.
"For these summer holidays, Europeans will simply get what they see when they book their holidays," Věra Jourová, commissioner for justice, consumers and gender equality, said in a statement. "Comparing and booking online hotel or accommodation has made it fast and easy for consumers. Now consumers can also trust that the price they see on the first page will be the price to pay in the end."
Jourová commended Airbnb for cooperating with the European Commission and national consumer protection authorities to improve the way its platform works.
"I expect other platforms to follow suit, " she said.
Airbnb changed how it presents offers after the European Commission warned in July 2018 that its practices did not respect EU consumer law. One of the Commission's main complaints was that consumers faced higher-than-expected prices at the time of booking, as cleaning fees and other charges were added at the last stage.
Now, search results display the final price that consumers have to pay. This price includes all charges, including cleaning and other fees. The platform will also state clearly if the property is being offered by a private individual or a professional.
Airbnb's website will also clearly display a link to a dispute resolution platform.
The company has also revised its terms of service to make clear that users can bring a case against Airbnb before the courts of their country of residence and that users' basic legal rights to sue a host in case of personal harm or other damages will be respected. The company also pledges not to unilaterally change the terms and conditions without clearly informing users in advance and without giving them the possibility to cancel the contract.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFormer Miral GC Brings Commercial Insight to BCLP’s Middle East Real Estate Practice
4 minute read‘A Slave Drivers' Contract’: Evri Legal Director Grilled by MPs
Serco Drops Three Firms Including Clifford Chance from Legal Panel
Trending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250