Airbnb Bows to EU Demands, Changes Way It Displays Fees
The changes mean the San Franciso-based company is now in compliance with EU consumer protection law and will not have to pay millions of euros in fines.
July 11, 2019 at 06:30 PM
2 minute read
Airbnb has changed the way it displays offers and prices on its online platform – a move that brings it into compliance with EU consumer protection law and enables the company to avoid paying multimillion-euro fines.
The European Commssion on Thursday announced that the San Francisco-based company had passed a year-long probe by its consumer watchdog, the Consumer Protection Cooperation Network.
"For these summer holidays, Europeans will simply get what they see when they book their holidays," Věra Jourová, commissioner for justice, consumers and gender equality, said in a statement. "Comparing and booking online hotel or accommodation has made it fast and easy for consumers. Now consumers can also trust that the price they see on the first page will be the price to pay in the end."
Jourová commended Airbnb for cooperating with the European Commission and national consumer protection authorities to improve the way its platform works.
"I expect other platforms to follow suit, " she said.
Airbnb changed how it presents offers after the European Commission warned in July 2018 that its practices did not respect EU consumer law. One of the Commission's main complaints was that consumers faced higher-than-expected prices at the time of booking, as cleaning fees and other charges were added at the last stage.
Now, search results display the final price that consumers have to pay. This price includes all charges, including cleaning and other fees. The platform will also state clearly if the property is being offered by a private individual or a professional.
Airbnb's website will also clearly display a link to a dispute resolution platform.
The company has also revised its terms of service to make clear that users can bring a case against Airbnb before the courts of their country of residence and that users' basic legal rights to sue a host in case of personal harm or other damages will be respected. The company also pledges not to unilaterally change the terms and conditions without clearly informing users in advance and without giving them the possibility to cancel the contract.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBroadcom Hires From Nuclear Giant to Appoint French Legal Head
GCs Say They are Getting 'Edged Out' of UK Boardrooms
'I Won’t Name the Firm, But...'—Barratt Redrow's Legal Head on External Counsel Red Flags
Trending Stories
- 1Carter Mario Achieves $225,000 Settlement in Motor Vehicle Case
- 2Legal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
- 3'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
- 4SEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
- 5NY Firm's Amicus Brief Asks for Corporate Transparency Act to Remain on Pause
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250