Funds Heavyweight Among Further London O'Melveny Defections
Jonathan Blake is among the latest to have resigned from the firm, which remains in merger talks with A&O.
July 31, 2019 at 09:12 AM
3 minute read
Two lawyers have resigned from O'Melveny & Myers in London, the most recent in a flurry of departures this year.
Senior funds consultant Jonathan Blake has resigned from the firm along with finance and capital markets counsel Karen Ireland, according to one person with knowledge of the matter.
Ireland is set to join U.S. rival Akin Gump in September, reuniting with several former O'Melveny colleagues who made the same move earlier this year, according to two people with knowledge of the matter.
Blake has stepped down from the firm after two years as a consultant. He joined the U.S. firm's London office in January 2017 from King & Wood Mallesons, where he was head of international funds.
Previously, he was senior partner at legacy SJ Berwin from 2006 to 2012.
Blake is one of the U.K.'s best-known private equity funds lawyers. In the late 1980s, he negotiated the guidelines for the use of limited partnerships as venture capital investment funds with the Inland Revenue and Department of Trade and Industry, paving the way for the use of limited partnerships in European fund structures.
Ireland joined O'Melveny in 2010 from Slaughter and May, where she had spent eight years as an associate.
She also spent time on secondment at Barclays and Shell. Her move to Akin Gump will see her reunite with several former colleagues, including ex-O'Melveny partners Daniel Quinn, Aleksander Bakic and John Daghlian, who moved across in June.
O'Melveny's funds team is led by Hong Kong based partner James Ford, and the firm recently promoted lawyer Alicja Biskupska-Haas to partner in the team.
Following the most recent exits from O'Melveny's London base, the outpost now comprises four partners, six counsel and one associate, according to the firm's website.
The moves come amid O'Melveny's merger discussions with Magic Circle firm Allen & Overy.
The firms have been in merger talks for more than a year, with the latest issues to be discussed prior to a merger including remuneration, pension liabilities, firm governance and working capital requirements.
If the merger goes through, it would create a firm with combined revenues of more than £2 billion and in excess of 3,000 lawyers.
An O'Melveny spokesperson said: "We wish Jonathan and Karen well."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250