Questions Remain Over Dentons' Seoul Office as Legal Giant Combines With Korean Firm
Both Dentons and Lee International said the combination is not a joint venture. Lee International also said it will not integrate with Dentons' 6-year-old foreign legal consultant office in Seoul.
August 13, 2019 at 04:32 AM
4 minute read
As Dentons prepares to combine with a mid-sized South Korean firm, questions remain over the future of the global legal giant's six-year-old Seoul office.
Last week, Dentons announced it was combining with Lee International, a Seoul-based domestic firm with about 30 lawyers. Meanwhile, Dentons already operates in Seoul as a foreign law practice with the office it inherited from predecessor firm McKenna Long & Aldridge after the firms merged in 2015.
In a statement, Dentons said the combination will give it the ability to practise Korean law. Under Korean regulations, global firms can have access to the Korean market by opening a foreign legal consultant office in Seoul—which cannot offer Korean law advice—or through an alliance with a local firm. The only way a global firm can directly practise Korean law is by forming a joint venture with a local firm. Both Dentons and Lee International confirmed that the combination is not a joint venture.
So far, none of the 28 foreign firms in Korea have a joint venture, partially because it is too restrictive and unfavourable to them—the foreign firm would have to be solely responsible for 100% of the joint venture while only being able to own 49% of it.
According to Dentons' website, the Seoul office has two partners: Andrew Park and Song Jung. Both are intellectual property specialists who also spend time in Washington, D.C. Park opened the Seoul office in 2013 for McKenna Long as the legacy U.S. firm's first office in Asia and has since been managing the outpost. In December, Park advised Korean supermarket chain E-Mart Inc. on IP and technology matters on a $275 million acquisition of U.S. food retailer Good Food Holdings.
The representative attorney of Lee International, Park Sung-duck, said his firm will not be integrated with Dentons' Seoul office. Instead, Lee International is merely joining the Dentons group, he said, which is organised in a Swiss verein structure.
A Washington, D.C.-based spokesperson for Dentons said it intends to have only one office in Seoul. But the Lee International combination will give Dentons two offices: Lee International's and legacy McKenna Long's.
Dentons' spokesperson said the firm is in discussions with regulators about how to manage its foreign licence and local presence in Korea. Changes made to a foreign legal consultant office in Seoul require approval by the Korean authorities. An official at the international legal affairs division of the Korean Ministry of Justice, who manages the foreign legal consultant offices, said the government was not informed of the specifics of the combination between Dentons and Lee International.
Dentons' Park declined to comment on whether his Seoul office will close. Dentons' Washington, D.C.-based global chairman, Joseph Andrew, and global CEO, Elliott Portnoy, did not respond to requests for comment. The firm's spokesperson said the firm will not discuss future plans until the partner vote regarding the combination with Lee International is completed, which is expected to happen in the next few months.
At least two international firms opted to form alliances with Korean firms instead of opening an office in Seoul, as they get access to the Korean market without making a significant commitment on the ground. Bird & Bird has a non-exclusive partnership with HMP Law, while Taylor Wessing has an exclusive alliance with DR & AJU; both alliances were formed in 2014.
So far, two global firms have closed their Seoul offices. McDermott Will & Emery, which was among the first global firms to set up a Seoul office in 2012, withdrew from Korea last month. And last November, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, which was also part of the 2012 wave, shuttered its Seoul office and relocated its Korea practice back to Hong Kong.
Asia's fourth-largest economy is still an attractive market for global firms. Two U.S. firms recently set up shop in Seoul. Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer and Shearman & Sterling opened in February and November, respectively.
|Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readSingapore Oil Tycoon Appeals 17.5 Year Prison Sentence In Fraudulent Trading Case
Charles Russell Speechlys Opens in Milan to Focus on Ultra-High Net Worth Clients
Trending Stories
- 1LexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
- 2'Everything Leaves a Digital Footprint': How to Navigate the Complexities of Internal Investigations
- 3Baker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
- 4PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
- 5The Dynamic Duo Behind CMG's Legal Ops Team
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250