Local and International Firms on $680M Australian Government Legal Panel
Clayton Utz, Sparke Helmore and Ashurst are among the firms that won the most legal work from the federal government in 2017-18.
August 16, 2019 at 08:33 AM
2 minute read
The Australian government has established a panel of more than 60 law firms to compete for more than AUD1 billion, or $680 million, in government legal work during the next five years.
The government on Friday launched the Whole-of-Government Legal Services Panel, which government agencies will be required to use for the bulk of their legal work until 2024.
"The provision of external legal services to the Commonwealth is worth about AUD230 million per year based on spending in 2017-18," attorney general Christian Porter said in a statement.
Practice areas include workplace, industrial relations and compensation; corporate and commercial; public law; and property and environment; along with litigation and legal support.
Global firms Ashurst, King & Wood Mallesons and Norton Rose Fulbright have strong representation across all the practice areas on the panel, as do local firms Clayton Utz, Gadens, Holding Redlich, HWL Ebsworth, Maddocks, Mills Oakley, MinterEllison, Moray & Agnew and Sparke Helmore.
The Big Four's KPMG Law and PricewaterhouseCoopers also made the government panel.
While government agencies will be required to use the panel for the bulk of their external legal services, each agency can engage off-panel providers for up to 10% of its external expenditure and where specific exemptions have been granted by the Attorney General's Department.
Data provided to Law.com by the Attorney General's Department revealed that Clayton Utz won close to AUD35 million worth of federal government legal work – or 10% of the total, and the largest share of any law firm – in 2017-18. Next were Sparke Helmore with almost AUD28 million, Ashurst with AUD21 million, and MinterEllison and King & Wood Mallesons, each with about AUD17 million.
The largest share of the work – 34%, worth AUD118 million – was carried out by the Australian government solicitor. Altogether, the government spent close to AUD350 million on legal services last fiscal year.
The Whole-of-Government Legal Services Panel was recommended by the Attorney General's Department secretary's review of commonwealth legal services, to leverage the government's purchasing power and increase efficiencies for both providers and agencies requiring legal services, the department said in a statement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Big Six Korean Firm Bae, Kim & Lee Boosts Disputes Offering With Former A&O Lifer
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose, Greenberg Traurig, White & Case Lead Major Deals in Asia
Aviation Attorney and Pilot Analyzes Jeju Air Crash, Potential Litigation Issues
Shoosmiths Hires Two Locke Lord London Partners as Part of a Six-Strong IP Team
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Fearless Forecaster’s Employment Law Predictions for 2025
- 2Judicial Conference Declines Democratic Request to Refer Justice Thomas to DOJ
- 3People in the News—Jan. 2, 2025—Eastburn and Gray, Klehr Harrison
- 4Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 5Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
