Litigation Funder LCM Looks to Corporate Funding as Revenue Rises
Revenue rose 17% over the past year. But net profit was down 15% due to higher costs, the firm said.
September 10, 2019 at 02:59 PM
3 minute read
Australian litigation funder Litigation Capital Management (LCM) reported a strong rise in full-year revenue and said it looks to an increase in corporate portfolio funding for future growth.
Revenue for the 12 months to June 30 was up 17% to A$34.7 million ($23.8 million), while gross profit of A$20.34 million ($14 million) increased by 23%, said the firm, which is listed on London's AIM stock exchange.
"We are pleased to present a strong set of results for FY 2019, which we have delivered alongside unprecedented growth and expansion across all areas of our business," said chief executive Patrick Moloney in a statement.
Net profit was down, however, due to higher costs.
The litigation funder reported a net profit for the year ending June 30 of A$10.2 million ($7 million), down 15% from A$12.0 million ($8.2 million) the year before. And cash receipts from the completion of litigation investments were down 1% at A$26.8 million ($18.4 million).
The Sydney-based firm opened offices in Singapore and London during the past year and is now looking to expand its corporate portfolio funding business, whereby a litigation funder provides capital for a range of litigation activities, both on the plaintiff side and the defence, for a company.
Moloney said the firm originated more than 15 applications and funded two corporate transactions during the past year. "This number might seem small, but it represents more than any other funder globally and corporate portfolio funding remains a key part of our growth strategy going forward," he said.
LCM said the use of litigation finance through choice rather than necessity – as is the case with corporate portfolio funding – is a far greater addressable market for the industry and is that remains almost entirely unaddressed.
"The significant growth opportunity here is for well-capitalised corporate entities that currently fund their own disputes on a balance sheet using their cash resources," the firm said. "LCM is observing an early, but encouraging, change in attitude from corporates globally as they recognise the value of using an external source of capital rather than shareholders' funds."
Nick Rowles-Davies, who was recruited to the London office as executive vice-chairman to target the corporate market, is a pioneer in the field, LCM said.
LCM has also been piloting a funding solution for the insolvency market in Australia and the U.K.
"Smaller claims arising out of insolvency typically require a less significant funding commitment and have a shorter duration period, which in turn will see potential returns being realised at a faster and more consistent rate," the company said.
Overall as of June 30, LCM had a portfolio of 29 current projects under management, up 45% from the year before. Some 23 projects are unconditionally funded and six projects are conditionally funded.
As of September 3, LCM said it has pre-qualified 64 pipeline projects with an estimated investment of A$394 million ($270.4 million).
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Year, New Ventures: 2025 Kicks Off with Mergers, Alliances, and Hidden Ambitions
5 minute readRajah & Tann Strengthens Shenzhen Offering, Renames International Arbitration Head
Dentons Germany Elects First Gender-Balanced Leaders & Promotions at Noerr, Gleiss Lutz
2 minute readSlaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Conduct Watchdog Opposes Supreme Court Justice's Bid to Withdraw Appeal of Her Removal
- 2Lessons in Mediation & Negotiation: Attorneys' Reflections on Jimmy Carter
- 3Legal Issues to Watch in the US Appeals Courts in 2025
- 4Ex-MoviePass CEO Submits to Ban, Settling SEC Allegations
- 5Baker McKenzie, Jones Day, Reed Smith Make 2025 Partner Promotions
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250