WTO Rules US Can Impose $7.5B in Tariffs on EU Exports Because of Airbus Subsidies
The ruling sets the stage for a new potential trade war, as the WTO is expected to also rule that the EU can impose tariffs on U.S. exports because of Boeing subsidies.
October 02, 2019 at 03:30 PM
3 minute read
The World Trade Organization (WTO) has ruled that the U.S. can impose penalty tariffs worth $7.5 billion on imports of EU goods to compensate for harm to Boeing – a move that could open up a new front in the Trump administration's trade wars.
A WTO arbitrator said on Wednesday that the U.S. was entitled to impose retaliatory duties on EU products because of illegal subsidies the EU had provided to European airplane manufacturer Airbus.
The decision marks the biggest arbitration award ever issued by the WTO and stems from a 15-year battle over government support programmes for aircraft makers Airbus and Boeing Co, which the two sides claim have harmed their domestic airplane makers.
But in what could amount to a tit-for-tat, the trade regulator is expected to rule next year on a separate case brought by the EU over U.S. subsidies to Boeing, which also have been deemed illegal. The WTO will determine in that case the value of U.S. exports the EU will be permitted to hit with tariffs.
The Wednesday ruling sets the stage for a possible trade war between the EU and the U.S. The EU has offered to negotiate a settlement, but Cecilia Malmström, the EU's trade chief, said the U.S. has not responded.
"The EU has, as recently as this July, shared concrete proposals with the U.S. for a new regime on aircraft subsidies, and a way forward on existing compliance obligations on both sides. So far, the U.S. has not reacted," she said.
She also appealed to the U.S. not to impose penalties, saying they would be "shortsighted and counterproductive".
The mutual imposition of countermeasures, Malmström said, "would only inflict damage on businesses and citizens on both sides of the Atlantic, and harm global trade and the broader aviation industry at a sensitive time".
Under WTO rules, a country that wins a ruling that financial support violates the global trade body's rules can impose penalties on imports of goods from the losing country. The WTO decides the value of the penalties so that they compensate for the economic harm caused by the illegal subsidies.
Malmström warned that the EU would have little choice but to retaliate if the U.S. went ahead and imposed penalties on EU exports to the U.S.
"Our readiness to find a fair settlement remains unchanged. But if the U.S. decides to impose WTO-authorised countermeasures, it will be pushing the EU into a situation where we will have no other option than to do the same."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKennedys and Irwin Mitchell Replace Longstanding Leaders
Asia's Top Stories 2024: Departures, Layoffs and Breakups at the Likes of Kirkland, Skadden and Mayer Brown
Hogan Lovells M&A Partner Returns to Baker McKenzie Ahead Australia Exit
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tik Tok’s ‘Blackout Challenge’ Confronts the Limits of CDA Section 230 Immunity
- 2AI and the Evolution of Legal Talent Functions
- 3Morgan Lewis To Acquire Kramer Levin's Paris Office
- 4Advice to Practicing Lawyers About Their Future
- 5Retired Judges Say Newman’s Challenge to Disability Law Should Proceed
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250