Ex-Proskauer Associate Banned From Profession For 'Deliberate, Calculated and Repeated' Dishonesty
The lawyer claimed his work environment contributed to his behaviour, saying he was told that he "could f**k off and cry to HR".
October 08, 2019 at 05:40 AM
3 minute read
A former associate at Proskauer Rose has been banned from the profession for gross misconduct and repeated dishonesty towards the firm, a Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) hearing has ruled.
Michael Freeman, who worked across the firm's private credit and restructuring practices, told the firm he had taken and passed a firm-funded Certificate for Proficiency in Insolvency (CPI) qualification, when in fact he had never sat the exam.
Freeman then claimed on multiple occasions to partners and members of his team during the course of 2017 and 2018 that he held the qualification.
In February last year, he was approached by his supervisor with requests for the certificate. According to the tribunal findings, he claimed he could not present the certificate – firstly because his house was being redecorated, and then because it was at his ex-fiancee's house.
Finally, when instructed to order a new certificate, he admitted to having failed the exam. Following an internal investigation and suspension, Freeman's employment at Proskauer was terminated in April 2018, six years after he joined the firm as a paralegal.
As well as banning him from the legal profession, the SDT ordered him to pay costs of £9,423. The tribunal also ruled that his actions had "caused harm to the firm", and that although his original dishonesty had been spontaneous, it was "thereafter deliberate, calculated and repeated".
As part of his defence, Freeman denied acting dishonestly, claiming that his actions had been affected by his state of mind, which in turn had been impacted by intense work pressure and a fear of failure.
He alleged that his line manager, an unnamed partner at the firm, often spoke to him in an "aggressive tone and raised voice", at one point telling him to "f**k off up the corridor and become a Lego lawyer, Lego Law".
On another occasion, Freeman claimed that his line manager demanded he prioritise his work over anything else, and that if he didn't like the points he was making, he could "f**k off and cry to HR about it but would never work for [him] again".
Responding to these claims, Freeman's line manager told the tribunal hearing that their team had been through "some extremely challenging times" and that this history meant "it is only healthy and natural that we are able to have open and frank discussions and occasionally we all swear", adding: "I am no exception."
Following his departure from Proskauer, Freeman became a consultant at Ashurst before leaving in October 2018, according to his LinkedIn profile. Ashurst confirmed he was employed as on a contract basis during this period.
Freeman's ban follows that of Akin Gump partner Igor Krivoshekov, who was found to have claimed thousands of pounds worth of misused expenses from his firm.
Freeman declined to comment. Proskauer Rose did not respond to requests for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250