Ex-DLA Piper Partner Blasts Assault Claims As Second Woman Comes Forward
Louis Lehot has blasted his initial accuser for "exploiting" #MeToo. A second complainant has since come forward.
October 22, 2019 at 04:25 AM
3 minute read
Louis Lehot, the former DLA Piper partner who was dismissed from the firm earlier this month after being accused of sexual assault by partner Vanina Guerrero, has accused Guerrero of "exploiting the #MeToo movement to cover up her own issues".
Yesterday (October 21), Lehot made his first public statement since the accusations against him surfaced. He denied Guerrero's claims and provided more than 40 pages of purported emails between the two lawyers showing friendly exchanges during the period of time in which Guerrero has alleged she was assaulted repeatedly.
Later in the day it emerged that a second woman, a former human resources employee at DLA Piper, has also lodged a complaint against Lehot.
She claims that she was fired early this year after complaining that she was "physically afraid" to be near Lehot.
Lawyers at Wigdor LLP, the same firm that represented DLA Piper partner Vanina Guerrero in raising allegations about Lehot, yesterday lodged a complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on her behalf.
According to a letter attached to the former employee's EEOC charge, she claims that Lehot threatened her after she refused to fire an administrative assistant he wanted terminated. The former HR employee further claims that she was fired after she complained to firm management that she feared being near Lehot or left alone with him.
In an open letter published earlier this month, Guerrero accused Lehot of sexually assaulting her multiple times in the months after he recruited her to join the firm. She also called on DLA Piper to release her from her mandatory arbitration agreement with the firm.
Lehot was fired from the firm several days later.
But less than a week after Lehot was pushed out, DLA Piper announced that it had placed Guerrero on administrative leave. The firm said that while investigating her claims against Lehot, it had found that another person had accused Guerrero of inappropriate behaviour.
"It's good to see the truth is beginning to come out. I did not assault or harass Vanina Guerrero and she knows it," Lehot said in his statement.
"I acknowledge poor judgement in developing an emotional relationship with Vanina Guerrero. I deeply regret the pain this has caused my family, colleagues, clients and friends," Lehot continued. "This isn't victim-blaming or victim-shaming. She's not a victim here."
According to Lehot, he agreed to leave the firm earlier this month because he acknowledged that he should not have developed an emotional relationship with the junior partner. He said he fully cooperated with DLA Piper's investigation, and alleged that Guerrero refused to cooperate.
Lehot made reference to numerous emails between himself and Guerrero, around the times of the alleged assaults, in which they coordinated travel arrangements and Guerrero requested a seat next to him on flights. The emails also showed discussion of personal matters, like an exchange of advice on which bedsheets Lehot should buy.
Reached for comment yesterday, Wigdor LLP partner Jeanne Christensen, who represents Guerrero, said, "By this, Louis Lehot is saying he's OK with litigating in open court and no secret arbitration."
Spokespeople for DLA Piper, reached on Monday, referred to the firm's previous statements on the matter.
Dan Packel contributed to this report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHengeler Advises On €7B Baltica 2 Wind Farm Deal Between Ørsted and PGE
2 minute readIsraeli Firm Pearl Cohen Combines with San Francisco IP Boutique
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250