Brexit: UK Law Firms' Overseas Gamble is Paying Off, PwC Says
A wide-ranging report by the Big Four firm also details how the UK's top firms are faring in their efforts to get more women and ethnic minorities into senior positions.
October 24, 2019 at 06:18 AM
3 minute read
The U.K.'s top law firms are "reaping the rewards" of investing in their international offices as they respond to the challenges posed by Brexit, according to new research from PwC.
PwC's law firms' survey 2019 has found that firms that have established and invested in their international offices are excelling as revenues and profit growth in their bases overseas start to exceed that of their U.K. headquarters.
Collectively, the top ten law firms – which PwC defines as U.K.-headquartered firms with international revenues exceeding 20% of total revenue – sourced 74% of their fee income growth and 85% of their profit growth from international offices, with bases in western Europe (excluding U.K.) generating approximately half of all fee income growth.
The report details that, among the top 10 firms, international offices grew profit "by 9.5% before accounting for exchange rate movements" in the past year. Moreover, the Big Four accounting giant expects larger firms to continue investing in international markets as they arm themselves against possible Brexit fallout.
Twenty percent of the top 10 and 61% of top 11-25 firms view Brexit as the most significant challenge facing the legal profession, contrasting with last year's survey, which found that none among the top 25 reported the U.K.'s withdrawal from the EU as a significant challenge.
Nevertheless, as an increasing number of mid-tier U.K. law firms view Brexit as a major obstacle to hitting financial performance targets, most among the top 10 believe technological change is the primary challenge to growth.
Despite these concerns, PwC found that 89% of the top 100 law firms achieved growth in 2019 – up 5% on 2018.
Resilience
PwC's law firms advisory group suggests that, in order to remain resilient in the run-up to Brexit, firms should consider whether their EU offices will require a change in structure, whether they can react quickly to the conclusion of the Brexit negotiations, and whether they are ready to respond to opportunities that Brexit will bring.
Kate Wolstenholme, leader of PwC's law firms advisory group and editor of the survey report, said in a statement: "Firms in the top 25 are battling an ongoing erosion in margin, but this is in part due to strategic investment as opposed to increasing staff costs, which have hit margin in recent years.
"Although this is undoubtedly a drag at the moment, investing in system updates and innovation will enable firms to grow a more sustainable business in the long term and build market share."
Other findings
The survey also found that, among the top 10, minority representation at partner level stands at 7%, with just under one fifth of top 10 and top 11-25 firms having black, Asian or Middle Eastern partner representation targets in place. The authors of the report advise firms to base targets on "realistic internal expectations of what success in this area would look like".
Meanwhile, during the last seven years, female representation at partner level has risen steadily among the top 10 – up nearly 5% to 20.4%.
However, top 11-25 firms have seen a decline in female partner numbers, from 19.3% in 2018 to just over 18%.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readSingapore Oil Tycoon Appeals 17.5 Year Prison Sentence In Fraudulent Trading Case
Charles Russell Speechlys Opens in Milan to Focus on Ultra-High Net Worth Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 2GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 3'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 4Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 5Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250