IP Firm Rouse Launches in Shenzhen
The office in the Chinese technology hub, located close to Hong Kong, is Rouse's fifth in China.
October 24, 2019 at 02:33 PM
3 minute read
London-based intellectual property firm Rouse has opened an office in the Chinese technology hub of Shenzhen – the latest global firm to do so since firms began launching outposts in the southern China city in 2017.
The office provides consultancy services for Chinese companies looking to expand abroad and foreign companies seeking to enter the Shenzhen market. Linda Chang, Rouse's Shanghai-based China general manager, is the sole IP lawyer in the Shenzhen office, according to its website.
Shenzhen is Rouse's fifth office in China, after Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Hong Kong. Elsewhere in Asia, Rouse has offices in Bangkok; Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Jakarta, Indonesia; Manila, Philippines; Phnom Penh, Cambodia; and Yangon, Myanmar.
"With the central and local governments announcing ambitious plans to support this innovation strategy long term, it seems a no-brainer for the leading IP firm in China to be here," Luke Minford, the London-based chief executive of Rouse, said in a statement. In August, the Chinese government issued a policy paper outlining a plan to make Shenzhen a leading global metropolis by the middle of the 21st century.
Shenzhen is a 30-minute train ride from Hong Kong, which has experienced protests and demonstrations for months as its residents try to ensure that China keeps its promise of recognising Hong Kong as part of "one country, two systems" – a policy established when Hong Kong was handed over by the British in 1997.
Some of China's biggest technology companies, including Tencent, Huawei and ZTE, are headquartered in Shenzhen. IP specialist firms Brinks Gilson & Lione and Fish & Richardson were the first two global firms to open an office in Shenzhen – Brinks in 2017 and Fish & Richardson in January this year. Hybrid virtual law firm Rimon Law and U.K. firm Simmons & Simmons have opened Shenzhen offices, while the Chinese member law firm of Big Four accounting firm EY merged with Shenzhen-based Guangdong Allied Law Firm earlier this year.
In August, Herbert Smith Freehills formed a joint operation with Chinese firm Kewei Law Firm under a Shanghai Free Trade Zone programme, giving the Anglo-Australian firm access to a Chinese law practice. Linklaters, Ashurst, Hogan Lovells, Holman Fenwick Willan and Baker McKenzie have also formed similar joint operations since 2015.
|Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readSingapore Oil Tycoon Appeals 17.5 Year Prison Sentence In Fraudulent Trading Case
Charles Russell Speechlys Opens in Milan to Focus on Ultra-High Net Worth Clients
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250