Magic Circle Partnerships' Oxbridge and Private School Bias Exposed
A major Legal Week study has found nearly half of Magic Circle partners were educated at the elite universities, with the figure even higher at Slaughter and May.
October 29, 2019 at 06:08 AM
8 minute read
Two thirds of Slaughter and May's partners were educated at the Universities of Oxford or Cambridge and about half were privately educated, according to Legal Week research that lays bare the dominance of that background across the top echelons of the Magic Circle.
Across all five elite firms – Allen & Overy, Clifford Chance, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Linklaters and Slaughters – nearly 50% of the 804 London partners hailed from one of the two elite universities, based on data compiled from partners' website biographies, legal directories and LinkedIn profiles, as well as alma mater resources.
The data monitored attendance at Oxford or Cambridge, whether at undergraduate or postgraduate level.
Additionally, in every single Magic Circle firm, privately educated partners formed the largest group by educational background. In total, they accounted for more than half of the U.K.-taught total for which there is available data, according to the firms' own diversity statistics.
About 2% of the U.K.'s current university population attend Oxbridge while about 7% of the population attend private school.
The figures call into question the firms' hiring practices and have attracted criticism from campaigners such as Dr Wanda Wyporska, executive director at Equality Trust, who said "there is a huge amount of work to be done".
The Oxbridge connection
Slaughters' partnership was by far the most lopsided in terms of Oxbridge representation. Of its 92 partners, 31 went to Oxford while another 30 went to Cambridge, while just 28 went to any other university. Three partners had no available data. The firm declined to comment on the lack of diversity.
But Slaughters was far from alone. At both Freshfields and Linklaters, 48% of U.K. partners attended Oxbridge, the research found. At Clifford Chance and Allen & Overy, the figures were slightly lower, with four in 10 Clifford Chance partners attending Oxbridge, and 35% at A&O.
The combined total puts Oxbridge clearly ahead of the next best-represented university, Bristol, which accounted for 39 partners (5%) across the five firms. The third and fourth best-represented universities were University College London and King's College London, with 26 (3%) and 25 (3%) respectively.
Just one university outside of England supplied more than 10 partners to the Magic Circle: Edinburgh. While fewer than five partners in total attended university in Wales or Northern Ireland.
Outside of the Russell group, representation is also extremely low. At Slaughters for example, just one partner attended a non-Russell Group U.K. University. Reading was the most-represented non-Russell Group university, amassing a total of five partners (less than 1% of the total) according to the Legal Week analysis.
Old school ties
When it comes to schooling, privately educated partners represented the largest educational group across all five firms, accounting for an average of 43% of all partners.
However, when viewed as a proportion of U.K.-educated students on which information was available, the stats were even more slanted.
Privately educated partners outnumbered state-educated partners by, on average, 10%. Allen & Overy has the most disproportionate ratio of 61:39, followed by Slaughters on 58:42.
A fifth of Linklaters partners did not declare their educational background, but its privately educated partners still outnumbered those who were state educated.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Increase in Artificial Intelligence-Related Securities Class Actions
- 2Trump’s DOE Pick Could Spell Trouble for Title IX Enforcement, Higher Ed Funding
- 3Jefferson Doctor Hit With $6.8M Verdict Over Death of 64-Year-Old Cancer Patient
- 4Seven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 1
- 5What Went Wrong With Adeel Mangi's Long, Strange Trip Through the Judicial Nomination Process?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250