A&O Holds Skadden Departee to Nine Months' Notice
In an unusual move, London partner Simon Toms will remain at the Magic Circle firm on gardening leave until next summer.
November 01, 2019 at 05:55 AM
3 minute read
Allen & Overy is holding one of its partners joining Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom to a nine-month notice period.
In a highly unusual move, London partner Simon Toms will remain at the Magic Circle firm on gardening leave until June next year, despite the fact he resigned for Skadden alongside fellow corporate partner George Knighton in September, according to two people close to the process. Knighton has already started at Skadden.
Although it is common for partners to be subject to long notice periods, it is rare for firms to enforce them, according to lawyers and recruiters.
"In about a third of cases, partners are held to any length of notice, usually two to three months, but more often than not they get to go," commented one recruiter. "Once someone is going, it is expensive and disruptive [to keep them]," he said, adding that holding someone to a long notice period can be perceived as a "sign of vulnerability".
One person with knowledge of the situation said: "It seems like they are trying to punish Simon."
Toms is still listed as a partner on A&O's website but the link to his profile is broken.
He is a regular adviser to 21st Century Fox and was part of a team that advised on its £24.5 billion bid for Sky last year. Other clients he has worked with include Virgin Active, News UK, the Rwanda Development Board and artificial intelligence startup Deepmind.
Another person said Toms and Knighton had been in favour of A&O merging with O'Melveny & Myers. Long-running talks between the two firms collapsed in early September. A separate person said the departures and notice period were unrelated to the merger talks.
Knighton and Toms did not respond to requests for comment.
A&O declined to comment.
The way firms treat departing partners has come into focus following Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton's decision to fire a four-partner team last week after the firm learned of their planned exit to Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer.
The move raised eyebrows among rivals, with some saying it was a case of "sour grapes". One former Cleary partner added it was a "very un-Cleary" move to make.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCanadian Media Giants Sue OpenAI Over Alleged Copyright Violations in ChatGPT Training
3 minute readFormer Head of Finance at DLA Piper and Freshfields Quietly 'Struck Off'
2 minute readAshurst Bolsters Singapore Offering With A&O Shearman Hire
Trending Stories
- 1'Go 12 Rounds' or Settle: Rear-End Collision Leads to $2.25M Presuit Settlement
- 22 Federal Judges Rescind Senior Status After Trump Win. Might More Follow?
- 3Japan Highlights Burr & Forman Director's 'Body Of Work' With Highest Honor
- 4Unanswered Questions on Remote Work Complicate NJ Wage Transparency Law, Litigators Say
- 5DeSantis Appointed Assistant US Attorney to Broward Circuit Court Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250