Australian Legal Startup Lawpath Closes $3 Million Funding Round
Funds from the oversubscribed round will be used to further develop new products, increase marketing, and expand the business in Australia and into Asia.
November 06, 2019 at 02:51 PM
2 minute read
Australian legal startup Lawpath has raised A$4.4 million ($3 million) in what it said is one of the largest funding rounds for legaltech in Australian history.
Funds from the oversubscribed funding round will be used to further develop new products, increase marketing and expand the business in Australia and into Asia.
Founded in Sydney in 2014, Lawpath targets small and medium-sized businesses with an online legal services platform, which it said provides "quality legal solutions – for a fraction of the time, cost and complexity of the traditional system".
The firm said it keeps costs down with technology and by tapping into the spare capacity in Australian law firms.
The funding round came as the company launched its Legal Advice Plan, which it said gives Australian businesses access to a lawyer on demand for a monthly fee of A$49 ($34).
Lawpath CEO Dominic Woolrych said there has been a shift in attitudes towards online and less-traditional legal services.
"Australians are embracing a new wave of legal technology, which, similar to online banking or accounting, has made this core service accessible online. We hope with this capital we can continue to help everyday Australians get the legal help they actually need, but often neglect due to cost and complexity," he said.
"Over 87% of businesses still struggle to engage or access legal services. The Lawpath platform tackles this problem head-on with DIY tools, registration and a marketplace of 1,000 online lawyers."
Adcock Private Equity led the oversubscribed round, which included Pollenizer Investments, LegalZoom, Fort Street Advisors, Macdoch Ventures and Norton Rose Fulbright's head of innovation, Nick Abrahams.
"It's fantastic to again receive the backing of our current investors. This funding allows us to accelerate our growth here in Australia and move up into Asia," Woolrych said.
He said that more than two million Australians visit Lawpath each year to find legal help. Both clients and lawyers can sign up for a free trial of the platform, which has now been used by roughly 1% of Australian small and medium-sized businesses.
Lawpath did not reveal a company valuation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKim & Chang, Freshfields, A&O Shearman Take Top Spots for Highest Collective Deal Value as APAC M&A Grew By Just 1% in 2024
Another Partner Exits Deloitte Legal—Former M&A Head Joins UK Top 50 Law Firm
KPMG Law US Targets Alternative Business Licence, Shaking Up Legal Status Quo
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1To Speed Criminal Discovery, NY Bill Proposes Police-to-Prosecutor Pipeline For Records
- 2Merchan Rejects Trump's Bid to Delay Manhattan Sentencing
- 3High-Low Settlement Agreement 'Does Not Alone Establish Bias:' State High Court Affirms $20M Med Mal Verdict
- 4NYAG Preparing to Withdraw From Defense of Four Correction Officers' Federal Lawsuits
- 52 Judges: Meet the New Chief Justice and the GC Who Just Rose to the Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250